Thanks Uwe. On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:47 AM Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Anshum, > > > > I will now enable the tests for 5.5 branch on Jenkins! > > > > Uwe > > > > ----- > > Uwe Schindler > > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > > http://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: [email protected] > > > > *From:* Anshum Gupta [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2016 7:01 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: Release Solr 5.5.3 > > > > With SOLR-9310 out of the door and 6.2.0 out, this is a good time to > resume the 5.5.3 release. Unless any one has any objections, I'll have an > RC out on Wednesday. > > > > -Anshum > > > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:08 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> > wrote: > > UPDATE: I'm just holding back to see if we can have a solution for > SOLR-9310 and have # of upgrades for our users. If we don't have any > clarity by Thursday, I'll start working on the release. > > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I plan on cutting the RC later tonight or tomorrow, unless there are > objections. > > > > @Noble: Can you comment on the status of SOLR-9310 (on the JIRA) and if it > makes sense to hold 5.5.3 ? > > > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Pushkar Raste <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Can we also get SOLR-9310 in as well > > On Jul 20, 2016 6:28 PM, "Erick Erickson" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I also would like to get SOLR-7280 in, Noble and I just checked it in > to that branch as well. > > Erick > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> > wrote: > > As Shai mentioned, it is actually about SSL + indexing requests leading > to > > unstable state in Solr. > > > > How quickly that state is reached is a function of # indexing requests. > > Thanks for correcting me on that one :-). > > > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, David Smiley <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for > those > >> using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise alarm > >> bells too loudly :-) > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it > >>> impacts all users with high indexing rates. > >>> > >>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else, > >>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Anshum Gupta > >> > >> -- > >> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker > >> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: > >> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Anshum Gupta > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > -- > > Anshum Gupta > > > > > > -- > > Anshum Gupta > >
