I've been trying to the RC out since yesterday but our tests are holding me back. Once they pass, I'll have the RC out (should be in a few hours).
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 1:37 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Uwe. > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:47 AM Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Anshum, >> >> >> >> I will now enable the tests for 5.5 branch on Jenkins! >> >> >> >> Uwe >> >> >> >> ----- >> >> Uwe Schindler >> >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >> >> http://www.thetaphi.de >> >> eMail: [email protected] >> >> >> >> *From:* Anshum Gupta [mailto:[email protected]] >> *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2016 7:01 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: Release Solr 5.5.3 >> >> >> >> With SOLR-9310 out of the door and 6.2.0 out, this is a good time to >> resume the 5.5.3 release. Unless any one has any objections, I'll have an >> RC out on Wednesday. >> >> >> >> -Anshum >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:08 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> UPDATE: I'm just holding back to see if we can have a solution for >> SOLR-9310 and have # of upgrades for our users. If we don't have any >> clarity by Thursday, I'll start working on the release. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I plan on cutting the RC later tonight or tomorrow, unless there are >> objections. >> >> >> >> @Noble: Can you comment on the status of SOLR-9310 (on the JIRA) and if >> it makes sense to hold 5.5.3 ? >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Pushkar Raste <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Can we also get SOLR-9310 in as well >> >> On Jul 20, 2016 6:28 PM, "Erick Erickson" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I also would like to get SOLR-7280 in, Noble and I just checked it in >> to that branch as well. >> >> Erick >> >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > As Shai mentioned, it is actually about SSL + indexing requests leading >> to >> > unstable state in Solr. >> > >> > How quickly that state is reached is a function of # indexing requests. >> > Thanks for correcting me on that one :-). >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, David Smiley <[email protected] >> > >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for >> those >> >> using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise alarm >> >> bells too loudly :-) >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it >> >>> impacts all users with high indexing rates. >> >>> >> >>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else, >> >>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now. >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Anshum Gupta >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker >> >> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: >> >> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Anshum Gupta >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Anshum Gupta >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Anshum Gupta >> >>
