Are the tests failing due to patch for SOLR-9310? I think Noble put in fix yesterday or a day before.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote: > I've been trying to the RC out since yesterday but our tests are holding > me back. Once they pass, I'll have the RC out (should be in a few hours). > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 1:37 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> > wrote: > >> Thanks Uwe. >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:47 AM Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: >> >>> Hi Anshum, >>> >>> >>> >>> I will now enable the tests for 5.5 branch on Jenkins! >>> >>> >>> >>> Uwe >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> >>> Uwe Schindler >>> >>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >>> >>> http://www.thetaphi.de >>> >>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Anshum Gupta [mailto:ans...@anshumgupta.net] >>> *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2016 7:01 PM >>> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org >>> *Subject:* Re: Release Solr 5.5.3 >>> >>> >>> >>> With SOLR-9310 out of the door and 6.2.0 out, this is a good time to >>> resume the 5.5.3 release. Unless any one has any objections, I'll have an >>> RC out on Wednesday. >>> >>> >>> >>> -Anshum >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:08 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>> UPDATE: I'm just holding back to see if we can have a solution for >>> SOLR-9310 and have # of upgrades for our users. If we don't have any >>> clarity by Thursday, I'll start working on the release. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I plan on cutting the RC later tonight or tomorrow, unless there are >>> objections. >>> >>> >>> >>> @Noble: Can you comment on the status of SOLR-9310 (on the JIRA) and if >>> it makes sense to hold 5.5.3 ? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Pushkar Raste <pushkar.ra...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Can we also get SOLR-9310 in as well >>> >>> On Jul 20, 2016 6:28 PM, "Erick Erickson" <erickerick...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I also would like to get SOLR-7280 in, Noble and I just checked it in >>> to that branch as well. >>> >>> Erick >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> >>> wrote: >>> > As Shai mentioned, it is actually about SSL + indexing requests >>> leading to >>> > unstable state in Solr. >>> > >>> > How quickly that state is reached is a function of # indexing requests. >>> > Thanks for correcting me on that one :-). >>> > >>> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, David Smiley < >>> david.w.smi...@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for >>> those >>> >> using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise >>> alarm >>> >> bells too loudly :-) >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> >>> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it >>> >>> impacts all users with high indexing rates. >>> >>> >>> >>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else, >>> >>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Anshum Gupta >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker >>> >> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: >>> >> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Anshum Gupta >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Anshum Gupta >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Anshum Gupta >>> >>>
