On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On May 3, 2011, at 12:49 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: > >> Isn't this the future we are working towards? > > No, not really. Others perhaps, but not me. I'm on board with some modules. I > do think there are tradeoffs when considering them and considering Lucene and > Solr. I'm happy to take everything one issue at a time. >
I hope the outcome of this discussion is a shared sense of the relationship between lucene, solr, and modules -- we need some general guidelines so that every time this comes up we don't have to have the same discussion over and over. Mike I agree with the general vision -- the details on how it would actually work suggest that we may have to fast forward more then a "year or two" for most of these things -- but who knows. ryan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
