I was thinking that if buildAndPushRelease.py can identify problems early, the 
RM won’t have to later redo work when a problem is found, e.g. by the smoke 
tester.  IMHO the extra 10 minutes (on my laptop anyway) from auto-running 
precommit would be worth it.

But I agree that the smoke tester should be heavy, since it’s possible that the 
RM had weird local conditions that weren’t caught by the release production 
tools.

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

> On Apr 20, 2017, at 10:23 AM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> They are both quite long processes. Perhaps we should look at eliminating 
> some of the overlap? 
> 
> Since the smokeTesters is run by those voting on the release maybe this 
> should be the heavier of the two.
> 
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> 
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> Also, I think buildAndPushRelease.py should invoke “precommit" too, (near) 
> where it runs 'ant clean test'.
> 
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
> 
> > On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:51 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > That’s bizarre.
> >
> > The smoke tester runs ‘ant validate’, which does *not* include 
> > "documentation-lint” (which includes "-ecj-javadoc-lint”, where unused 
> > imports are looked for).
> >
> > By contrast, ‘ant precommit’ runs “check-working-copy”, “validate”, and 
> > “documentation-lint”.
> >
> > Jenkins caught this not because of the smoke tester, but rather because the 
> > “nightly-smoke” task it uses runs “-jenkins-base”, which, like “precommit”, 
> > runs “check-working-copy”, “validate”, and “documentation-lint” (among 
> > others).
> >
> > I think we should change the smoke tester to look at the same things as 
> > precommit,
> >
> > --
> > Steve
> > www.lucidworks.com
> >
> >> On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:29 AM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Smoke testes passed as well
> >>
> >>
> >> Joel Bernstein
> >> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I guess precommit is only run as part of the smoke tester.
> >>
> >>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:20 AM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Interesting the entire release process completed without complaining.
> >>>
> >>> Joel Bernstein
> >>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> The unused import was the only problem; I’ve removed it on branch_6_5.
> >>>
> >>> Sorry, hope I didn’t cause a delay in the release process.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Steve
> >>> www.lucidworks.com
> >>>
> >>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 8:57 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Crap, Jenkins found an unused import in my commit on branch_6_5 :(.  I 
> >>>> forgot to run precommit.  Doing so now.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Steve
> >>>> www.lucidworks.com
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 8:07 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Done.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Steve
> >>>>> www.lucidworks.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 7:49 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Woohoo!  Thanks Joel.  Running all tests on branch_6_5 now.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Steve
> >>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 7:20 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> 
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm OK with restarting RC2. Let me know when you finish the back port.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> >>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Joel,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I know you’re in-process with RC2, but if you have to restart for 
> >>>>>>> some reason, I’d like to include SOLR-10527.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> Steve
> >>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 6:57 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> 
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I also had to change the smoke tester because of the SSL issue. 
> >>>>>>>> Which in theory means everyone else will have to as well. I'm 
> >>>>>>>> pushing out my changes to branch_6_5, so people can just update 
> >>>>>>>> their branch before running the smoke tester.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> >>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> 
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Ok, I had to push out three changes to the branch but I seemed to 
> >>>>>>>> have moved passed this issue.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> >>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> 
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> I'll push out the changes and then revert. Hopefully the changes 
> >>>>>>>> will do the trick after they've been pushed.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> >>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Yeah, that is a sucky part of this: you want to make modifications 
> >>>>>>>> on the release branch, but you can’t test unless you commit (and 
> >>>>>>>> push).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Another alternative: make modifications in another checkout, then 
> >>>>>>>> invoke the script with from an unmodified source tree.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> e.g.:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> cd ..
> >>>>>>>> cp -r lucene-solr lucene-solr-2 # assuming lucene-solr is your 
> >>>>>>>> checkout dir
> >>>>>>>> # edit lucene-solr-2/dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py
> >>>>>>>> cd lucene-solr
> >>>>>>>> python3 -u ../lucene-solr-2/dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py 
> >>>>>>>> …
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> (a shorter form of that is to make a copy the script alone and 
> >>>>>>>> invoke the modified version from your checkout)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Steve
> >>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 4:32 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> 
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Ha, that doesn't work either. Now I get this error:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> RuntimeError: There are unpushed commits - "git log 
> >>>>>>>>> origin/branch_6_5.." output is:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> So, I'm going to have to push this out.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Let's first decide if this makes sense as the way forward.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> >>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Joel Bernstein 
> >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Steve, when I change the script to turn off verification I get the 
> >>>>>>>>> following error:
> >>>>>>>>> RuntimeError: git clone is dirty:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> So as part of the work around I think I'm going to have to commit 
> >>>>>>>>> locally and then revert locally. Does that make sense to you as the 
> >>>>>>>>> way forward?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> >>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch 
> >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Could it be anything to do with the fact that the signer is Semantic
> >>>>>>>>> and they are being actively distrusted by - at least - Google:
> >>>>>>>>> http://www.securityweek.com/google-stops-trusting-symantec-issued-certificates
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>> Alex.
> >>>>>>>>> ----
> >>>>>>>>> http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and 
> >>>>>>>>> experienced
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 19 April 2017 at 16:22, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> 
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Ok, I'll turn off the cert verification. I wasn't sure if cert 
> >>>>>>>>>> verification
> >>>>>>>>>> was something that was integral to the process.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> >>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> 
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Joel,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Not sure why this is suddenly an issue - I guess “SNI”
> >>>>>>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication> has been 
> >>>>>>>>>>> enabled on
> >>>>>>>>>>> archive.apache.org?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Some useful info here (about a “requests” lib, AFAICT an 
> >>>>>>>>>>> alternative to
> >>>>>>>>>>> urllib):
> >>>>>>>>>>> <http://docs.python-requests.org/en/master/community/faq/#what-are-hostname-doesn-t-match-errors>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Short term, you could turn off certificate verification.  The 
> >>>>>>>>>>> bottom
> >>>>>>>>>>> answer here uses the same lib as the script (urllib instead of 
> >>>>>>>>>>> urllib2,
> >>>>>>>>>>> which is assumed in the other answers on the page), to turn off 
> >>>>>>>>>>> certificate
> >>>>>>>>>>> verification:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19268548/python-ignore-certicate-validation-urllib2>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>> Steve
> >>>>>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 3:43 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that it's failing on verifying the SSL cert for
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://archive.apache.org/dist/lucene/java/.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Joel Bernstein 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I started working on 6.5.1 RC2. I ran the following:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py --push-local
> >>>>>>>>>>>> /tmp/releases/6.5.1 --rc-num 2 --sign EE64CB1E
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I believe this is same basic command I used for RC1. But this 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> time I got
> >>>>>>>>>>>> a new error. At first I thought it might be incorrect keystore 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> password but
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I changed it and it is correct. Any thoughts what the issue is?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line 313, in 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <module>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> main()
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line 294, in 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> main
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> rev = prepare(c.root, c.version, c.key_id, c.key_password)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line 98, in 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> prepare
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> checkDOAPfiles(version)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line 143, in
> >>>>>>>>>>>> checkDOAPfiles
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> distpage = load(url)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line 67, in load
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> content = 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> urllib.request.urlopen(urlString).read().decode('utf-8')
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> File
> >>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> >>>>>>>>>>>> line 223, in urlopen
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> return opener.open(url, data, timeout)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> File
> >>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> >>>>>>>>>>>> line 526, in open
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> response = self._open(req, data)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> File
> >>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> >>>>>>>>>>>> line 544, in _open
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> '_open', req)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> File
> >>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> >>>>>>>>>>>> line 504, in _call_chain
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> result = func(*args)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> File
> >>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> >>>>>>>>>>>> line 1361, in https_open
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> context=self._context, check_hostname=self._check_hostname)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> File
> >>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> >>>>>>>>>>>> line 1320, in do_open
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> raise URLError(err)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> urllib.error.URLError: <urlopen error [SSL: 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED]
> >>>>>>>>>>>> certificate verify failed (_ssl.c:749)>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to