Joel,

I’ve reverted your SSL changes to smokeTestRelease.py, and I don’t see any 
problems so far when I run it with my Python 3.4.2 with the 6.5.1RC2 URL.  
(Still in progress; Lucene distributions have downloaded so far.)

What was the error that caused you to make the SSL changes to 
smokeTestRelease.py?  And what version of Python are you using?

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

> On Apr 20, 2017, at 1:01 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I have Python 3.4.2 on my Linux box, and apparently 3.4.3 is the first that 
> supports the changes you made, so the smoke tester is failing for me:
> 
> -----
>  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 165, in load
>    content = urllib.request.urlopen(urlString, 
> context=ctx).read().decode('utf-8')
> TypeError: urlopen() got an unexpected keyword argument ‘context’
> ------
> 
> I’ll install a newer Python.
> 
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
> 
>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 12:51 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> thanks
>> 
>> Joel Bernstein
>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>> 
>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I’ll take a look.
>> 
>> --
>> Steve
>> www.lucidworks.com
>> 
>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I've uploaded the RC2 here 
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.5.1-RC2-revdfc0dd67f7fe45fbf62d88652952ec3e2b3e0070/.
>>> 
>>> But the smoke test breaks with SSL error in different spot when you smoke 
>>> test from this URL. It's failing with a different command this time so the 
>>> fix I used in other sports of smoke tester doesn't work.
>>> 
>>> Steve, would you mind taking a look at this and pushing out a fix?
>>> 
>>> Joel Bernstein
>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I was thinking that if buildAndPushRelease.py can identify problems early, 
>>> the RM won’t have to later redo work when a problem is found, e.g. by the 
>>> smoke tester.  IMHO the extra 10 minutes (on my laptop anyway) from 
>>> auto-running precommit would be worth it.
>>> 
>>> But I agree that the smoke tester should be heavy, since it’s possible that 
>>> the RM had weird local conditions that weren’t caught by the release 
>>> production tools.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Steve
>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>> 
>>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 10:23 AM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> They are both quite long processes. Perhaps we should look at eliminating 
>>>> some of the overlap?
>>>> 
>>>> Since the smokeTesters is run by those voting on the release maybe this 
>>>> should be the heavier of the two.
>>>> 
>>>> Joel Bernstein
>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Also, I think buildAndPushRelease.py should invoke “precommit" too, (near) 
>>>> where it runs 'ant clean test'.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Steve
>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:51 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> That’s bizarre.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The smoke tester runs ‘ant validate’, which does *not* include 
>>>>> "documentation-lint” (which includes "-ecj-javadoc-lint”, where unused 
>>>>> imports are looked for).
>>>>> 
>>>>> By contrast, ‘ant precommit’ runs “check-working-copy”, “validate”, and 
>>>>> “documentation-lint”.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jenkins caught this not because of the smoke tester, but rather because 
>>>>> the “nightly-smoke” task it uses runs “-jenkins-base”, which, like 
>>>>> “precommit”, runs “check-working-copy”, “validate”, and 
>>>>> “documentation-lint” (among others).
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think we should change the smoke tester to look at the same things as 
>>>>> precommit,
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Steve
>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:29 AM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Smoke testes passed as well
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> I guess precommit is only run as part of the smoke tester.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:20 AM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Interesting the entire release process completed without complaining.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> The unused import was the only problem; I’ve removed it on branch_6_5.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sorry, hope I didn’t cause a delay in the release process.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 8:57 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Crap, Jenkins found an unused import in my commit on branch_6_5 :(.  I 
>>>>>>>> forgot to run precommit.  Doing so now.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 8:07 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Done.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 7:49 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Woohoo!  Thanks Joel.  Running all tests on branch_6_5 now.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 7:20 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm OK with restarting RC2. Let me know when you finish the back 
>>>>>>>>>>> port.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Joel,
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I know you’re in-process with RC2, but if you have to restart for 
>>>>>>>>>>> some reason, I’d like to include SOLR-10527.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 6:57 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I also had to change the smoke tester because of the SSL issue. 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Which in theory means everyone else will have to as well. I'm 
>>>>>>>>>>>> pushing out my changes to branch_6_5, so people can just update 
>>>>>>>>>>>> their branch before running the smoke tester.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Joel Bernstein 
>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, I had to push out three changes to the branch but I seemed to 
>>>>>>>>>>>> have moved passed this issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Joel Bernstein 
>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll push out the changes and then revert. Hopefully the changes 
>>>>>>>>>>>> will do the trick after they've been pushed.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, that is a sucky part of this: you want to make modifications 
>>>>>>>>>>>> on the release branch, but you can’t test unless you commit (and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> push).
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Another alternative: make modifications in another checkout, then 
>>>>>>>>>>>> invoke the script with from an unmodified source tree.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> e.g.:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> cd ..
>>>>>>>>>>>> cp -r lucene-solr lucene-solr-2 # assuming lucene-solr is your 
>>>>>>>>>>>> checkout dir
>>>>>>>>>>>> # edit lucene-solr-2/dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py
>>>>>>>>>>>> cd lucene-solr
>>>>>>>>>>>> python3 -u 
>>>>>>>>>>>> ../lucene-solr-2/dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py …
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> (a shorter form of that is to make a copy the script alone and 
>>>>>>>>>>>> invoke the modified version from your checkout)
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 4:32 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ha, that doesn't work either. Now I get this error:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> RuntimeError: There are unpushed commits - "git log 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> origin/branch_6_5.." output is:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I'm going to have to push this out.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's first decide if this makes sense as the way forward.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Joel Bernstein 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve, when I change the script to turn off verification I get 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the following error:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> RuntimeError: git clone is dirty:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So as part of the work around I think I'm going to have to commit 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> locally and then revert locally. Does that make sense to you as 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the way forward?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could it be anything to do with the fact that the signer is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Semantic
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and they are being actively distrusted by - at least - Google:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.securityweek.com/google-stops-trusting-symantec-issued-certificates
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> experienced
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19 April 2017 at 16:22, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, I'll turn off the cert verification. I wasn't sure if cert 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verification
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was something that was integral to the process.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Joel,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure why this is suddenly an issue - I guess “SNI”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication> has been 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enabled on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> archive.apache.org?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some useful info here (about a “requests” lib, AFAICT an 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> urllib):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://docs.python-requests.org/en/master/community/faq/#what-are-hostname-doesn-t-match-errors>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Short term, you could turn off certificate verification.  The 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bottom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answer here uses the same lib as the script (urllib instead of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> urllib2,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is assumed in the other answers on the page), to turn off 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> certificate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verification:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19268548/python-ignore-certicate-validation-urllib2>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 3:43 PM, Joel Bernstein 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that it's failing on verifying the SSL cert for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://archive.apache.org/dist/lucene/java/.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Joel Bernstein 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I started working on 6.5.1 RC2. I ran the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --push-local
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tmp/releases/6.5.1 --rc-num 2 --sign EE64CB1E
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe this is same basic command I used for RC1. But this 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time I got
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a new error. At first I thought it might be incorrect keystore 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> password but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I changed it and it is correct. Any thoughts what the issue is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line 313, in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <module>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> main()
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line 294, in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> main
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rev = prepare(c.root, c.version, c.key_id, c.key_password)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line 98, in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prepare
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checkDOAPfiles(version)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line 143, in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checkDOAPfiles
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distpage = load(url)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line 67, in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> load
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content = 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> urllib.request.urlopen(urlString).read().decode('utf-8')
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 223, in urlopen
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return opener.open(url, data, timeout)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 526, in open
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response = self._open(req, data)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 544, in _open
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> '_open', req)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 504, in _call_chain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> result = func(*args)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 1361, in https_open
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context=self._context, check_hostname=self._check_hostname)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> File
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> line 1320, in do_open
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> raise URLError(err)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> urllib.error.URLError: <urlopen error [SSL: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> certificate verify failed (_ssl.c:749)>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> 
>> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to