I’ll take a look.

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

> On Apr 20, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I've uploaded the RC2 here 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.5.1-RC2-revdfc0dd67f7fe45fbf62d88652952ec3e2b3e0070/.
> 
> But the smoke test breaks with SSL error in different spot when you smoke 
> test from this URL. It's failing with a different command this time so the 
> fix I used in other sports of smoke tester doesn't work.
> 
> Steve, would you mind taking a look at this and pushing out a fix?
> 
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> 
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> I was thinking that if buildAndPushRelease.py can identify problems early, 
> the RM won’t have to later redo work when a problem is found, e.g. by the 
> smoke tester.  IMHO the extra 10 minutes (on my laptop anyway) from 
> auto-running precommit would be worth it.
> 
> But I agree that the smoke tester should be heavy, since it’s possible that 
> the RM had weird local conditions that weren’t caught by the release 
> production tools.
> 
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
> 
> > On Apr 20, 2017, at 10:23 AM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > They are both quite long processes. Perhaps we should look at eliminating 
> > some of the overlap?
> >
> > Since the smokeTesters is run by those voting on the release maybe this 
> > should be the heavier of the two.
> >
> > Joel Bernstein
> > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Also, I think buildAndPushRelease.py should invoke “precommit" too, (near) 
> > where it runs 'ant clean test'.
> >
> > --
> > Steve
> > www.lucidworks.com
> >
> > > On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:51 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > That’s bizarre.
> > >
> > > The smoke tester runs ‘ant validate’, which does *not* include 
> > > "documentation-lint” (which includes "-ecj-javadoc-lint”, where unused 
> > > imports are looked for).
> > >
> > > By contrast, ‘ant precommit’ runs “check-working-copy”, “validate”, and 
> > > “documentation-lint”.
> > >
> > > Jenkins caught this not because of the smoke tester, but rather because 
> > > the “nightly-smoke” task it uses runs “-jenkins-base”, which, like 
> > > “precommit”, runs “check-working-copy”, “validate”, and 
> > > “documentation-lint” (among others).
> > >
> > > I think we should change the smoke tester to look at the same things as 
> > > precommit,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Steve
> > > www.lucidworks.com
> > >
> > >> On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:29 AM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Smoke testes passed as well
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Joel Bernstein
> > >> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> I guess precommit is only run as part of the smoke tester.
> > >>
> > >>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:20 AM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Interesting the entire release process completed without complaining.
> > >>>
> > >>> Joel Bernstein
> > >>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>> The unused import was the only problem; I’ve removed it on branch_6_5.
> > >>>
> > >>> Sorry, hope I didn’t cause a delay in the release process.
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Steve
> > >>> www.lucidworks.com
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 8:57 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Crap, Jenkins found an unused import in my commit on branch_6_5 :(.  I 
> > >>>> forgot to run precommit.  Doing so now.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Steve
> > >>>> www.lucidworks.com
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 8:07 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Done.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> Steve
> > >>>>> www.lucidworks.com
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 7:49 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Woohoo!  Thanks Joel.  Running all tests on branch_6_5 now.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>> Steve
> > >>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 7:20 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> 
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I'm OK with restarting RC2. Let me know when you finish the back 
> > >>>>>>> port.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > >>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> 
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> Joel,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I know you’re in-process with RC2, but if you have to restart for 
> > >>>>>>> some reason, I’d like to include SOLR-10527.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>> Steve
> > >>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 6:57 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> 
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I also had to change the smoke tester because of the SSL issue. 
> > >>>>>>>> Which in theory means everyone else will have to as well. I'm 
> > >>>>>>>> pushing out my changes to branch_6_5, so people can just update 
> > >>>>>>>> their branch before running the smoke tester.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > >>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Joel Bernstein 
> > >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> Ok, I had to push out three changes to the branch but I seemed to 
> > >>>>>>>> have moved passed this issue.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > >>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Joel Bernstein 
> > >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> I'll push out the changes and then revert. Hopefully the changes 
> > >>>>>>>> will do the trick after they've been pushed.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > >>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> 
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> Yeah, that is a sucky part of this: you want to make modifications 
> > >>>>>>>> on the release branch, but you can’t test unless you commit (and 
> > >>>>>>>> push).
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Another alternative: make modifications in another checkout, then 
> > >>>>>>>> invoke the script with from an unmodified source tree.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> e.g.:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> cd ..
> > >>>>>>>> cp -r lucene-solr lucene-solr-2 # assuming lucene-solr is your 
> > >>>>>>>> checkout dir
> > >>>>>>>> # edit lucene-solr-2/dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py
> > >>>>>>>> cd lucene-solr
> > >>>>>>>> python3 -u 
> > >>>>>>>> ../lucene-solr-2/dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py …
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> (a shorter form of that is to make a copy the script alone and 
> > >>>>>>>> invoke the modified version from your checkout)
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>> Steve
> > >>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 4:32 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> 
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Ha, that doesn't work either. Now I get this error:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> RuntimeError: There are unpushed commits - "git log 
> > >>>>>>>>> origin/branch_6_5.." output is:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> So, I'm going to have to push this out.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Let's first decide if this makes sense as the way forward.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > >>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Joel Bernstein 
> > >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> Steve, when I change the script to turn off verification I get 
> > >>>>>>>>> the following error:
> > >>>>>>>>> RuntimeError: git clone is dirty:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> So as part of the work around I think I'm going to have to commit 
> > >>>>>>>>> locally and then revert locally. Does that make sense to you as 
> > >>>>>>>>> the way forward?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > >>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch 
> > >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> Could it be anything to do with the fact that the signer is 
> > >>>>>>>>> Semantic
> > >>>>>>>>> and they are being actively distrusted by - at least - Google:
> > >>>>>>>>> http://www.securityweek.com/google-stops-trusting-symantec-issued-certificates
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>> Alex.
> > >>>>>>>>> ----
> > >>>>>>>>> http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and 
> > >>>>>>>>> experienced
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On 19 April 2017 at 16:22, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> 
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>> Ok, I'll turn off the cert verification. I wasn't sure if cert 
> > >>>>>>>>>> verification
> > >>>>>>>>>> was something that was integral to the process.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > >>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> 
> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Joel,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Not sure why this is suddenly an issue - I guess “SNI”
> > >>>>>>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication> has been 
> > >>>>>>>>>>> enabled on
> > >>>>>>>>>>> archive.apache.org?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Some useful info here (about a “requests” lib, AFAICT an 
> > >>>>>>>>>>> alternative to
> > >>>>>>>>>>> urllib):
> > >>>>>>>>>>> <http://docs.python-requests.org/en/master/community/faq/#what-are-hostname-doesn-t-match-errors>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Short term, you could turn off certificate verification.  The 
> > >>>>>>>>>>> bottom
> > >>>>>>>>>>> answer here uses the same lib as the script (urllib instead of 
> > >>>>>>>>>>> urllib2,
> > >>>>>>>>>>> which is assumed in the other answers on the page), to turn off 
> > >>>>>>>>>>> certificate
> > >>>>>>>>>>> verification:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19268548/python-ignore-certicate-validation-urllib2>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Steve
> > >>>>>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 3:43 PM, Joel Bernstein 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> It appears that it's failing on verifying the SSL cert for
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://archive.apache.org/dist/lucene/java/.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Joel Bernstein 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I started working on 6.5.1 RC2. I ran the following:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> --push-local
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> /tmp/releases/6.5.1 --rc-num 2 --sign EE64CB1E
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I believe this is same basic command I used for RC1. But this 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> time I got
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> a new error. At first I thought it might be incorrect keystore 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> password but
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I changed it and it is correct. Any thoughts what the issue is?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line 313, in 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> <module>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> main()
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line 294, in 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> main
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> rev = prepare(c.root, c.version, c.key_id, c.key_password)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line 98, in 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> prepare
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> checkDOAPfiles(version)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line 143, in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> checkDOAPfiles
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> distpage = load(url)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line 67, in 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> load
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> content = 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> urllib.request.urlopen(urlString).read().decode('utf-8')
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> File
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> line 223, in urlopen
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> return opener.open(url, data, timeout)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> File
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> line 526, in open
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> response = self._open(req, data)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> File
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> line 544, in _open
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> '_open', req)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> File
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> line 504, in _call_chain
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> result = func(*args)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> File
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> line 1361, in https_open
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> context=self._context, check_hostname=self._check_hostname)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> File
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> line 1320, in do_open
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> raise URLError(err)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> urllib.error.URLError: <urlopen error [SSL: 
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> certificate verify failed (_ssl.c:749)>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to