+1. I did not find any issues besides those Mark and Robert reported. If you respin, will it be done from the latest 3x revision? If so, it means a couple more issues will be released as well, in which case we need to ensure their Fix Version is still 3.2. Also, there are issues that are marked 3.2 while they were closed after the RC (like LUCENE-3147) - should we change their version to 3.3? Can we easily tell those issues?
LUCENE-3004 is marked a blocker for 3.2 - are we going to move it to 3.3 or hold up 3.2? There are 32 issues overall marked for 3.2 (that are still open) - I suggest we bulk move all of them to 3.3 and then selectively update those that make it into another RC (if one is produced). Shai On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Please vote to release the artifacts at: > > http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucene_solr_320/rc1/ > > as Lucene 3.2.0 and Solr 3.2.0. > > Mike > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
