Yeah, I think it's enough to block a release: broken windows syndrome. It sucks that it was wrong in the 3.1 release - if I'd noticed it then, I would have -1'd it then.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Muir [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 6:58 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.2.0 > > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Steven A Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2. All contrib/*/CHANGES.txt have "3.2-dev" as the release header. -1 > to RC1 based on this. > > > > Just curious why you vote -1 to this in 3.2, when it was broken in > this same way in 3.1 :) > > Seriously, this is enough to block a release? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
