On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Steven A Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, I think it's enough to block a release: broken windows syndrome. > > It sucks that it was wrong in the 3.1 release - if I'd noticed it then, I > would have -1'd it then. >
its not really broken windows syndrome, there are a lot of bugs (known and unknown) with lucene. really releases need to be incremental improvements, only really serious shit (like index corruption or broken licensing or something) should be blockers IMO. lots of the things mentioned here have been broken for a long time (i have a lucene-2.4.0 checkout I am looking at just for fun). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
