Hi Anshum, Does running ant check-licenses from the Lucene directory fail as well? The error message that you are getting looks weird to me since Lucene 7.0 depends on ICU 59.1, not 56.1 since https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7540.
Le ven. 25 août 2017 à 23:42, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> a écrit : > A quick question, in case someone has an idea around what’s going on. When > I run the following command: > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py --push-local > /Users/anshum/solr/release/7.0.0/rc0 --rc-num 1 --sign <my-key> > > I end up with the following error: > > BUILD FAILED > /Users/anshum/workspace/lucene-solr/build.xml:117: The following error > occurred while executing this line: > /Users/anshum/workspace/lucene-solr/lucene/build.xml:90: The following > error occurred while executing this line: > /Users/anshum/workspace/lucene-solr/lucene/tools/custom-tasks.xml:62: JAR > resource does not exist: analysis/icu/lib/icu4j-56.1.jar > > Any idea as to what’s going on? This generally fails after the tests have > run, and the script has processed for about 45 minutes and it’s consistent > i.e. all the times when the tests pass, the process fails with this warning. > > I can also confirm that this file exists at > lucene/analysis/icy/lib/icu4j-56.1.jar . > > Has anyone else seen this when working on the release? > > -Anshum > > > > On Aug 23, 2017, at 4:21 AM, Andrzej Białecki < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > On 23 Aug 2017, at 13:06, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: > > Keep in mind that there is also branch_7_0. > > > Right, but the changes related to these issues were committed to master > before branch_7_0 was created, and these specific issues are only about > back-porting to 6x. > > > Uww > > Am 23. August 2017 12:26:42 MESZ schrieb "Andrzej Białecki" <[email protected] > >: >> >> >> On 23 Aug 2017, at 08:15, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I also found more issues when comparing 7x, with 6x this time. I’ll take >> a look at wether it’s just the CHANGES entries or have these actually >> missed the branch. I assume it’s just the CHANGES, but want to be sure. If >> the committers involved can pitch in, I’d appreciate, else I’ll work on >> this for a bit right now and continue with this tomorrow morning. >> >> - SOLR-10477 (Ab) >> >> >> This is a partial back-port of relevant improvements from master to 6x, >> so there are no strictly corresponding commits on 7x/master. >> >> - SOLR-10631: Metric reporters leak on 6x. (Ab) >> >> >> This one has been fixed as part of other related issues in branches 7.x / >> master, so it only required a specific fix for 6x. >> >> - SOLR-10000 (Ab) >> >> >> This has been committed first to 7x, then to 6x and it’s present in >> branch_6_6. >> >> >> --- >> Best regards, >> >> Andrzej Bialecki >> >> > -- > Uwe Schindler > Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen > https://www.thetaphi.de > > > >
