+1 SUCCESS! [2:06:13.881329] Regarding the broken dih example and whether we should respin, we have been trying to release 7.0.0 for more than two months and we already accumulated more than enough good changes to release 7.1.0. I'm worried about letting 7.0 slip for another couple weeks. So if we decide to cancel this vote, I think we should also consider merging branch_7x into branch_7_0 and restarting the release process from scratch. My preference is still to release 7.0 from branch_7_0 as soon as possible and start working on 7.1 in the coming weeks, but then we might need to increase the bug severity that is required to warrant a respin.
Le lun. 11 sept. 2017 à 12:52, Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> a écrit : > SUCCESS! [0:56:11.512628] > > +1. > > D. > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Thanks Christine > > > > The WARN msgs are not blockers. > > However, I tested the DIH ‘db’ example with 6.6.0 and it works, > indexing 16 > > documents. > > Also re-tested the example directly in branch_7_0 and it fails there > too, so > > this seems to be a regression, but I don’t know what the bug is. > > > > Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11348 as a blocker > for > > this, leaving it up to RM to lower the severity if the vote passes. > > > > -0 > > > > -- > > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > > > > 11. sep. 2017 kl. 04.53 skrev Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) > > <[email protected]>: > > > > Thanks Jan for these observations! > > > > The Couldn't add files WARNing seems be pre-existing and I've created > > SOLR-11346 to explore if actually it should be an ERROR/exception. > > > > About the solr.LatLonType WARNing, does the DIH example actually use > those > > field types? If not could they simply be removed instead of replaced, > unless > > perhaps we wish to keep all the example configs similar as much as > possible > > even if that means that some examples will have unused stuff? > > > > Those are my observations i.e. also not a vote. > > > > Christine > > > > From: [email protected] At: 09/10/17 22:19:11 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene/Solr 7.0.0 RC3 > > > > DIH example that failed in RC2 now loads, but still with three WARN level > > logs which is not ideal from a fresh install... > > > > WARN - 2017-09-10 20:44:02.927; [ x:mail] > > org.apache.solr.core.SolrConfig; Couldn't add files from > > /Users/janhoy/Downloads/solr-7.0.0/contrib/dataimporthandler/lib > filtered by > > .*\.jar to classpath: > > /Users/janhoy/Downloads/solr-7.0.0/contrib/dataimporthandler/lib > > WARN - 2017-09-10 20:44:03.454; [ x:db] > > org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader; Solr loaded a deprecated > > plugin/analysis class [solr.LatLonType]. Please consult documentation > how to > > replace it accordingly. > > WARN - 2017-09-10 20:44:03.454; [ x:mail] > > org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader; Solr loaded a deprecated > > plugin/analysis class [solr.LatLonType]. Please consult documentation > how to > > replace it accordingly. > > > > > > However, DIH “db” example does not work ootb. But it could have been > broken > > in earlier versions too? > > > > ERROR - 2017-09-10 20:46:29.317; [ x:db] > > org.apache.solr.common.SolrException; Exception while processing: item > > document : SolrInputDocument(fields: > > []):org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException: > Unable to > > execute query: select * from item Processing Document # 1 > > at > > > org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException.wrapAndThrow(DataImportHandlerException.java:69) > > … > > Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: error in script file line: 2 > > /Users/janhoy/Downloads/solr-7.0.0/example/example-DIH/hsqldb/ex system > > object cannot be modified in statement [CREATE CACHED TABLE ITEM(ID > > CHAR(8),NAME VARCHAR(100),MANU VARCHAR(50),WEIGHT REAL,PRICE > REAL,POPULARITY > > INTEGER,INCLUDES VARCHAR(200),LAST_MODIFIED TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NOW)] > > at org.hsqldb.jdbc.JDBCUtil.sqlException(Unknown Source) > > > > > > The “files” example that failed in RC2 now works. > > > > This is not a vote, just an observation :) Will run smoke tester later. > > > > -- > > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > > > > 9. sep. 2017 kl. 07.10 skrev Anshum Gupta <[email protected]>: > > > > Please vote for the third release candidate for Apache Lucene/Solr 7.0.0. > > > > Artifacts can be downloaded from: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-7.0.0-RC3-rev3ba304b29825a94249c5145b3f5061e87b87d8f8/ > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly from this command: > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-7.0.0-RC3-rev3ba304b29825a94249c5145b3f5061e87b87d8f8/ > > > > Reminder: You would need to run this from branch_7_0. > > > > Here's my +1: > > > > SUCCESS! [0:35:25.819530] > > > > -Anshum > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
