Here's my +1 which I missed posting in my previous message. On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Varun Thacker <[email protected]> wrote:
> SUCCESS! [0:55:46.354662] > > Let's not respin for SOLR-11348 > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: > >> My opinion: Let’s get 7.0 out ASAP. I don’t think the DIH db example >> problem should be a blocker. >> >> -- >> Steve >> www.lucidworks.com >> >> > On Sep 11, 2017, at 10:49 AM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Thanks for bringing this up and testing the RC out :). I am on the same >> page as Adrien, about the release being stuck, but having said I think that >> it's been in that position for good. >> > >> > As far as respiring the RC goes, I am happy to do that but if this is >> just a DIH 'example' issue, and as much as I'd want a completely fixed RC, >> we might still be ok moving ahead. >> > >> > If others feel that we should respin, I think we should merge in >> changes from 7x into 7.0. >> > >> > Thoughts? >> > >> > -Anshum >> > >> > >> > >> >> On Sep 11, 2017, at 6:00 AM, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> +1 SUCCESS! [2:06:13.881329] >> >> >> >> Regarding the broken dih example and whether we should respin, we have >> been trying to release 7.0.0 for more than two months and we already >> accumulated more than enough good changes to release 7.1.0. I'm worried >> about letting 7.0 slip for another couple weeks. So if we decide to cancel >> this vote, I think we should also consider merging branch_7x into >> branch_7_0 and restarting the release process from scratch. My preference >> is still to release 7.0 from branch_7_0 as soon as possible and start >> working on 7.1 in the coming weeks, but then we might need to increase the >> bug severity that is required to warrant a respin. >> >> >> >> Le lun. 11 sept. 2017 à 12:52, Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> a >> écrit : >> >> SUCCESS! [0:56:11.512628] >> >> >> >> +1. >> >> >> >> D. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Thanks Christine >> >> > >> >> > The WARN msgs are not blockers. >> >> > However, I tested the DIH ‘db’ example with 6.6.0 and it works, >> indexing 16 >> >> > documents. >> >> > Also re-tested the example directly in branch_7_0 and it fails there >> too, so >> >> > this seems to be a regression, but I don’t know what the bug is. >> >> > >> >> > Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11348 as a >> blocker for >> >> > this, leaving it up to RM to lower the severity if the vote passes. >> >> > >> >> > -0 >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect >> >> > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com >> >> > >> >> > 11. sep. 2017 kl. 04.53 skrev Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) >> >> > <[email protected]>: >> >> > >> >> > Thanks Jan for these observations! >> >> > >> >> > The Couldn't add files WARNing seems be pre-existing and I've created >> >> > SOLR-11346 to explore if actually it should be an ERROR/exception. >> >> > >> >> > About the solr.LatLonType WARNing, does the DIH example actually use >> those >> >> > field types? If not could they simply be removed instead of >> replaced, unless >> >> > perhaps we wish to keep all the example configs similar as much as >> possible >> >> > even if that means that some examples will have unused stuff? >> >> > >> >> > Those are my observations i.e. also not a vote. >> >> > >> >> > Christine >> >> > >> >> > From: [email protected] At: 09/10/17 22:19:11 >> >> > To: [email protected] >> >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene/Solr 7.0.0 RC3 >> >> > >> >> > DIH example that failed in RC2 now loads, but still with three WARN >> level >> >> > logs which is not ideal from a fresh install... >> >> > >> >> > WARN - 2017-09-10 20:44:02.927; [ x:mail] >> >> > org.apache.solr.core.SolrConfig; Couldn't add files from >> >> > /Users/janhoy/Downloads/solr-7.0.0/contrib/dataimporthandler/lib >> filtered by >> >> > .*\.jar to classpath: >> >> > /Users/janhoy/Downloads/solr-7.0.0/contrib/dataimporthandler/lib >> >> > WARN - 2017-09-10 20:44:03.454; [ x:db] >> >> > org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader; Solr loaded a deprecated >> >> > plugin/analysis class [solr.LatLonType]. Please consult >> documentation how to >> >> > replace it accordingly. >> >> > WARN - 2017-09-10 20:44:03.454; [ x:mail] >> >> > org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader; Solr loaded a deprecated >> >> > plugin/analysis class [solr.LatLonType]. Please consult >> documentation how to >> >> > replace it accordingly. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > However, DIH “db” example does not work ootb. But it could have been >> broken >> >> > in earlier versions too? >> >> > >> >> > ERROR - 2017-09-10 20:46:29.317; [ x:db] >> >> > org.apache.solr.common.SolrException; Exception while processing: >> item >> >> > document : SolrInputDocument(fields: >> >> > []):org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException: >> Unable to >> >> > execute query: select * from item Processing Document # 1 >> >> > at >> >> > org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerExceptio >> n.wrapAndThrow(DataImportHandlerException.java:69) >> >> > … >> >> > Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: error in script file line: 2 >> >> > /Users/janhoy/Downloads/solr-7.0.0/example/example-DIH/hsqldb/ex >> system >> >> > object cannot be modified in statement [CREATE CACHED TABLE ITEM(ID >> >> > CHAR(8),NAME VARCHAR(100),MANU VARCHAR(50),WEIGHT REAL,PRICE >> REAL,POPULARITY >> >> > INTEGER,INCLUDES VARCHAR(200),LAST_MODIFIED TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NOW)] >> >> > at org.hsqldb.jdbc.JDBCUtil.sqlException(Unknown Source) >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > The “files” example that failed in RC2 now works. >> >> > >> >> > This is not a vote, just an observation :) Will run smoke tester >> later. >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Jan Høydahl, search solution architect >> >> > Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com >> >> > >> >> > 9. sep. 2017 kl. 07.10 skrev Anshum Gupta <[email protected]>: >> >> > >> >> > Please vote for the third release candidate for Apache Lucene/Solr >> 7.0.0. >> >> > >> >> > Artifacts can be downloaded from: >> >> > >> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-7. >> 0.0-RC3-rev3ba304b29825a94249c5145b3f5061e87b87d8f8/ >> >> > >> >> > You can run the smoke tester directly from this command: >> >> > >> >> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py >> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-7. >> 0.0-RC3-rev3ba304b29825a94249c5145b3f5061e87b87d8f8/ >> >> > >> >> > Reminder: You would need to run this from branch_7_0. >> >> > >> >> > Here's my +1: >> >> > >> >> > SUCCESS! [0:35:25.819530] >> >> > >> >> > -Anshum >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> > >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >
