SUCCESS! [1:09:28.373226] On Mac OS X 10.12.6 with Oracle Java 1.8.0_131 and Ant 1.10.1
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe < [email protected]> wrote: > +1 > SUCCESS! [0:44:22.517203] > > Thanks for working on this Anshum! > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Tommaso Teofili < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> SUCCESS! [4:47:50.042814] >> >> +1 for me too, then a quick bugfix release which includes also SOLR-11348 >> >> Il giorno lun 11 set 2017 alle ore 19:08 Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> >> ha scritto: >> >>> I have the same opinion. I’ll let this vote run :) >>> >>> -Anshum >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sep 11, 2017, at 7:52 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> My opinion: Let’s get 7.0 out ASAP. I don’t think the DIH db example >>> problem should be a blocker. >>> >>> -- >>> Steve >>> www.lucidworks.com >>> >>> On Sep 11, 2017, at 10:49 AM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for bringing this up and testing the RC out :). I am on the same >>> page as Adrien, about the release being stuck, but having said I think that >>> it's been in that position for good. >>> >>> As far as respiring the RC goes, I am happy to do that but if this is >>> just a DIH 'example' issue, and as much as I'd want a completely fixed RC, >>> we might still be ok moving ahead. >>> >>> If others feel that we should respin, I think we should merge in changes >>> from 7x into 7.0. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> -Anshum >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sep 11, 2017, at 6:00 AM, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> +1 SUCCESS! [2:06:13.881329] >>> >>> Regarding the broken dih example and whether we should respin, we have >>> been trying to release 7.0.0 for more than two months and we already >>> accumulated more than enough good changes to release 7.1.0. I'm worried >>> about letting 7.0 slip for another couple weeks. So if we decide to cancel >>> this vote, I think we should also consider merging branch_7x into >>> branch_7_0 and restarting the release process from scratch. My preference >>> is still to release 7.0 from branch_7_0 as soon as possible and start >>> working on 7.1 in the coming weeks, but then we might need to increase the >>> bug severity that is required to warrant a respin. >>> >>> Le lun. 11 sept. 2017 à 12:52, Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> a >>> écrit : >>> SUCCESS! [0:56:11.512628] >>> >>> +1. >>> >>> D. >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Christine >>> >>> The WARN msgs are not blockers. >>> However, I tested the DIH ‘db’ example with 6.6.0 and it works, >>> indexing 16 >>> documents. >>> Also re-tested the example directly in branch_7_0 and it fails there >>> too, so >>> this seems to be a regression, but I don’t know what the bug is. >>> >>> Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11348 as a blocker >>> for >>> this, leaving it up to RM to lower the severity if the vote passes. >>> >>> -0 >>> >>> -- >>> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect >>> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com >>> >>> 11. sep. 2017 kl. 04.53 skrev Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) >>> <[email protected]>: >>> >>> Thanks Jan for these observations! >>> >>> The Couldn't add files WARNing seems be pre-existing and I've created >>> SOLR-11346 to explore if actually it should be an ERROR/exception. >>> >>> About the solr.LatLonType WARNing, does the DIH example actually use >>> those >>> field types? If not could they simply be removed instead of replaced, >>> unless >>> perhaps we wish to keep all the example configs similar as much as >>> possible >>> even if that means that some examples will have unused stuff? >>> >>> Those are my observations i.e. also not a vote. >>> >>> Christine >>> >>> From: [email protected] At: 09/10/17 22:19:11 >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene/Solr 7.0.0 RC3 >>> >>> DIH example that failed in RC2 now loads, but still with three WARN level >>> logs which is not ideal from a fresh install... >>> >>> WARN - 2017-09-10 20:44:02.927; [ x:mail] >>> org.apache.solr.core.SolrConfig; Couldn't add files from >>> /Users/janhoy/Downloads/solr-7.0.0/contrib/dataimporthandler/lib >>> filtered by >>> .*\.jar to classpath: >>> /Users/janhoy/Downloads/solr-7.0.0/contrib/dataimporthandler/lib >>> WARN - 2017-09-10 20:44:03.454; [ x:db] >>> org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader; Solr loaded a deprecated >>> plugin/analysis class [solr.LatLonType]. Please consult documentation >>> how to >>> replace it accordingly. >>> WARN - 2017-09-10 20:44:03.454; [ x:mail] >>> org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader; Solr loaded a deprecated >>> plugin/analysis class [solr.LatLonType]. Please consult documentation >>> how to >>> replace it accordingly. >>> >>> >>> However, DIH “db” example does not work ootb. But it could have been >>> broken >>> in earlier versions too? >>> >>> ERROR - 2017-09-10 20:46:29.317; [ x:db] >>> org.apache.solr.common.SolrException; Exception while processing: item >>> document : SolrInputDocument(fields: >>> []):org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException: >>> Unable to >>> execute query: select * from item Processing Document # 1 >>> at >>> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerExceptio >>> n.wrapAndThrow(DataImportHandlerException.java:69) >>> … >>> Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: error in script file line: 2 >>> /Users/janhoy/Downloads/solr-7.0.0/example/example-DIH/hsqldb/ex system >>> object cannot be modified in statement [CREATE CACHED TABLE ITEM(ID >>> CHAR(8),NAME VARCHAR(100),MANU VARCHAR(50),WEIGHT REAL,PRICE >>> REAL,POPULARITY >>> INTEGER,INCLUDES VARCHAR(200),LAST_MODIFIED TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NOW)] >>> at org.hsqldb.jdbc.JDBCUtil.sqlException(Unknown Source) >>> >>> >>> The “files” example that failed in RC2 now works. >>> >>> This is not a vote, just an observation :) Will run smoke tester later. >>> >>> -- >>> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect >>> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com >>> >>> 9. sep. 2017 kl. 07.10 skrev Anshum Gupta <[email protected]>: >>> >>> Please vote for the third release candidate for Apache Lucene/Solr 7.0.0. >>> >>> Artifacts can be downloaded from: >>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-7. >>> 0.0-RC3-rev3ba304b29825a94249c5145b3f5061e87b87d8f8/ >>> >>> You can run the smoke tester directly from this command: >>> >>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-7. >>> 0.0-RC3-rev3ba304b29825a94249c5145b3f5061e87b87d8f8/ >>> >>> Reminder: You would need to run this from branch_7_0. >>> >>> Here's my +1: >>> >>> SUCCESS! [0:35:25.819530] >>> >>> -Anshum >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >
