Since artifacts are available, I'll start a vote. I'm happy to respin if we
decide to.

Le lun. 18 juin 2018 à 19:52, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> a écrit :

> Hi Anshum,
>
>
>
> I was talking about **source** artifacts. Those will miss the commit,
> because it’s a tar.gz of whole source tree (lucene+solr+refguide)!
>
>
>
> Uwe
>
>
>
> -----
>
> Uwe Schindler
>
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Achterdiek+19,+D-28357+Bremen&entry=gmail&source=g>
>
> http://www.thetaphi.de
>
> eMail: [email protected]
>
>
>
> *From:* Anshum Gupta <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Monday, June 18, 2018 7:35 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Lucene/Solr 7.4
>
>
>
> The release binaries would miss the commit, but I don't think that we
> package the ref guide with they binaries so it should be ok.
>
>
>
> I'll push this to master for now and wait for Cassandra to confirm (or if
> someone else knows).
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:18 AM Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I think the source artifacts may miss the commit then. But that's not
> urgent, isn't it?
>
>
>
> Uwe
>
>
>
> Am June 18, 2018 5:09:02 PM UTC schrieb Adrien Grand <[email protected]>:
>
> Hi Anshum,
>
> I am in the process of uploading artifacts that passed precommit locally.
> Your changes seem to be only about the reference guide, which I think is
> built separately? I think that means that I could proceed with the current
> artifacts that I have, let you push your commit, and then we will just need
> to make sure that your commit is included when we build a release candidate
> of the ref guide?
>
> Hopefully Cassandra can confirm some of my assumptions.
>
>
>
> Le lun. 18 juin 2018 à 18:53, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> a
> écrit :
>
> Hi Adrien,
>
>
>
> Is it ok for my to commit the documentation patch for SOLR-11277?
>
>
>
> Anshum
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 2:24 AM Alan Woodward <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> LUCENE-8360 is committed.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 18 Jun 2018, at 08:38, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> The fix looks good to me, let's get it in before building the first RC?
>
>
>
> Le dim. 17 juin 2018 à 22:39, Alan Woodward <[email protected]> a
> écrit :
>
> I’m still debugging RandomChains failures, and found
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8360.  I don’t think it’s a
> Blocker though, and there will probably be more odd corners that
> ConditionalTokenFilter has exposed which can wait for 7.4.1  or a respin.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 15 Jun 2018, at 11:04, Simon Willnauer <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> this issue is fixed
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Simon Willnauer
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> our CI found a failure, I opened a blocker and attached a patch:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8358
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Simon Willnauer
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1 for a first RC
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> It looks like blockers are all resolved, please let me know if I am missing
> something. I will build a first RC on Monday.
>
> Le jeu. 14 juin 2018 à 15:02, Alan Woodward <[email protected]> a
> écrit :
>
>
> LUCENE-8357 is in.
>
> On 14 Jun 2018, at 09:27, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Le jeu. 14 juin 2018 à 10:02, Alan Woodward <[email protected]> a écrit
> :
>
>
> Hi Adrien,
>
> If possible I’d like to get LUCENE-8357 in, which fixes a regression in
> Explanations for Solr’s boost queries.
>
> Alan
>
>
> On 13 Jun 2018, at 20:42, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> It is. In general I trust your judgement to only backport low-risk fixes.
>
> Le mer. 13 juin 2018 à 21:03, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
>
> Crap, I forgot to ask for inclusion of SOLR-12481, a doc-only fix
> related to SOLR-12434.  I’m going to assume that it’s okay to backport as
> well, I’ll go do that now.  Sorry for the churn.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
>
> On Jun 13, 2018, at 1:49 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks, done.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
>
> On Jun 13, 2018, at 1:08 PM, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> OK to backport SOLR-12434.
>
> Le mer. 13 juin 2018 à 18:41, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Adrien,
>
> Are you okay with backporting SOLR-12434 to 7.4?
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
>
> On Jun 12, 2018, at 9:37 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Done, thanks Adrien.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
>
> On Jun 12, 2018, at 9:23 AM, Adrien Grand <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> +1 to backport LUCENE-8278 to 7.4. Thanks Steve.
>
> Le lun. 11 juin 2018 à 23:21, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> a écrit
> :
> Adrien,
>
> Are you okay with including the fix on LUCENE-8278 in 7.4?
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
>
> On Jun 11, 2018, at 11:24 AM, Adrien Grand <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> No worries Uwe, we'll wait. Enjoy Buzzwords!
>
> Le lun. 11 juin 2018 à 17:08, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> a
> écrit :
> I still have this new security issue and to fix it finally
> everywhere, it requires API changes. So please wait, I am working but
> buzzwords is so interesting! 🤯
>
> Uwe
>
>
> Am June 11, 2018 2:45:54 PM UTC schrieb David Smiley
> <[email protected]>:
> It'd be nice to get in this bug
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8344 but is pending a review.
>
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 4:24 AM Adrien Grand <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We released 7.3 two months ago on April 4th and we accumulated
> quite a number of features, enhancements and fixes that are not released
> yet, so I'd like to start working on releasing Lucene/Solr 7.4.0.
>
> I propose to create the 7.4 branch later this week and build the
> first RC early next week if that works for everyone. Please let me know if
> that are bug fixes that we think should make it to 7.4 and might not be
> ready by then.
>
> Adrien
> --
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author,
> Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>
> --
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Achterdiek+19,+28357+Bremen&entry=gmail&source=g>
> https://www.thetaphi.de
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> <[email protected]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> <[email protected]>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Achterdiek+19,+28357+Bremen&entry=gmail&source=g>
> https://www.thetaphi.de
>
>

Reply via email to