[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13103628#comment-13103628
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-2758:
------------------------------------
I think both caches should go in the same package. These seem like a utility in
nature so I think a util package is more appropriate.
Sorry about the patch formatting. This patch is trivial enough that someone
could do it manually.
> ConcurrentLRUCache should move from common/util to solr/util
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-2758
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2758
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: clients - java
> Affects Versions: 3.3
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-2758_move_ConcurrentLRUCache.patch
>
>
> There is exactly one small dependency that the SolrJ jar has to lucene-core
> and that is indirectly via ConcurrentLRUCache which is in common/util. SolrJ
> doesn't even use this cache but it's there any way. Attached is a patch for
> the move. It also removes the lucene-core dependency that the SolrJ maven
> pom.xml has on lucene-core.
> Steve Rowe agrees:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2756?focusedCommentId=13103103&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13103103
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
