Ishan, thanks for update. May I propose to hold it for this week, beside of the severe issues you mentioned, I'd like to drop pretty neat JSON Query parser for Interval Queries https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13764 this week.
пн, 30 сент. 2019 г., 18:04 Ishan Chattopadhyaya <[email protected] >: > * Due to some unfinished and half merged work in SOLR-13661, we are in > a difficult position for a branch cutting today (as I had proposed). > I have documented the options on how to deal with that immediately in > that issue. I'll work to resolve the situation and cut a branch as > soon as possible. > * SOLR-13677 is also a blocker for release, but I can proceed with the > branch cutting. > > I'll take a look at the ref guide's simultaneous release as we reach > closer to building the artifacts. > Thanks, > Ishan > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:06 PM Cassandra Targett <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > As I’ve mentioned to some of you over the past couple of weeks, I want > to propose that we don’t “release” the Ref Guide at all the way we have > been doing it. > > > > It deserves a separate thread, which since it’s come up a few times this > week I should start now, but in essence, my idea is to no longer treat the > PDF as a release artifact that requires a vote, and publish the HTML as our > primary version of the Ref Guide in effectively the same way we publish the > javadocs (at the same time as the binary artifacts). > > > > Instead of highjacking this thread with that discussion since it has > several aspects, let me send another mail on it where I can flesh it out > more and we can discuss there. I have the mail mostly queued up and ready > to go already. > > > > Cassandra > > On Sep 18, 2019, 10:23 AM -0500, Gus Heck <[email protected]>, wrote: > > > > I learned recently that it's actually all documented here: > https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/how-to-contribute.html#ref-guide-publication-process > > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 7:31 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Adrien, > >> Indeed, meant to write about starting a vote. > >> > >> @Gus, I'll have to let Cassandra weigh in on this one as I'm not very > familiar with the ref guide release process. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Ishan > >> > >> On Mon, 16 Sep, 2019, 7:28 PM Adrien Grand, <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> +1 to start working on 8.3 > >>> > >>> Did you mean "start a vote" when you wrote "release the artifacts"? It > >>> got me wondering because I don't think we frequently managed to go > >>> from cutting a branch to releasing artifacts in so little time in the > >>> past. > >>> > >>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 5:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > Hi all, > >>> > We have a lot of unreleased features and fixes. I propose that we cut > >>> > a 8.3 branch in two weeks (in order to have sufficient time to bake > in > >>> > all in-progress features). If there are no objections to doing so, I > >>> > can volunteer for the release as an RM and plan for cutting a release > >>> > branch on 30 September (and release the artifacts about 3-4 days > after > >>> > that). > >>> > > >>> > WDYT? > >>> > Regards, > >>> > Ishan > >>> > > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Adrien > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >>> > > > > > > -- > > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) > > http://www.the111shift.com (play) > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
