Thanks Andrzej, +1 for SOLR-13790 and SOLR-8241. Also, please provide some guidance on SOLR-13677 and how can we resolve it.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 2:11 PM Andrzej Białecki <[email protected]> wrote: > > I’m also working on SOLR-13790 (which is marked Critical, but depending on > your POV it could be a Blocker - the functionality is broken as is). > > If the feature freeze is next week then maybe I’ll also manage to finish > SOLR-8241, which would give users opportunity to test CaffeineCache > performance in real-life scenarios. > > > On 30 Sep 2019, at 22:59, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > Sure Mikhail, > > I'm okay to delay branch cutting by 1 week. > > If someone has any objections, please let me know. > > I'll try to see how we can get those blockers resolved. > > Regards, > > Ishan > > > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 1:27 AM Mikhail Khludnev <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Ishan, thanks for update. > >> May I propose to hold it for this week, beside of the severe issues you > >> mentioned, I'd like to drop pretty neat JSON Query parser for Interval > >> Queries https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13764 this week. > >> > >> пн, 30 сент. 2019 г., 18:04 Ishan Chattopadhyaya > >> <[email protected]>: > >>> > >>> * Due to some unfinished and half merged work in SOLR-13661, we are in > >>> a difficult position for a branch cutting today (as I had proposed). > >>> I have documented the options on how to deal with that immediately in > >>> that issue. I'll work to resolve the situation and cut a branch as > >>> soon as possible. > >>> * SOLR-13677 is also a blocker for release, but I can proceed with the > >>> branch cutting. > >>> > >>> I'll take a look at the ref guide's simultaneous release as we reach > >>> closer to building the artifacts. > >>> Thanks, > >>> Ishan > >>> > >>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:06 PM Cassandra Targett <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> As I’ve mentioned to some of you over the past couple of weeks, I want > >>>> to propose that we don’t “release” the Ref Guide at all the way we have > >>>> been doing it. > >>>> > >>>> It deserves a separate thread, which since it’s come up a few times this > >>>> week I should start now, but in essence, my idea is to no longer treat > >>>> the PDF as a release artifact that requires a vote, and publish the HTML > >>>> as our primary version of the Ref Guide in effectively the same way we > >>>> publish the javadocs (at the same time as the binary artifacts). > >>>> > >>>> Instead of highjacking this thread with that discussion since it has > >>>> several aspects, let me send another mail on it where I can flesh it out > >>>> more and we can discuss there. I have the mail mostly queued up and > >>>> ready to go already. > >>>> > >>>> Cassandra > >>>> On Sep 18, 2019, 10:23 AM -0500, Gus Heck <[email protected]>, wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I learned recently that it's actually all documented here: > >>>> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/how-to-contribute.html#ref-guide-publication-process > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 7:31 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Adrien, > >>>>> Indeed, meant to write about starting a vote. > >>>>> > >>>>> @Gus, I'll have to let Cassandra weigh in on this one as I'm not very > >>>>> familiar with the ref guide release process. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> Ishan > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, 16 Sep, 2019, 7:28 PM Adrien Grand, <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +1 to start working on 8.3 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Did you mean "start a vote" when you wrote "release the artifacts"? It > >>>>>> got me wondering because I don't think we frequently managed to go > >>>>>> from cutting a branch to releasing artifacts in so little time in the > >>>>>> past. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 5:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>> We have a lot of unreleased features and fixes. I propose that we cut > >>>>>>> a 8.3 branch in two weeks (in order to have sufficient time to bake in > >>>>>>> all in-progress features). If there are no objections to doing so, I > >>>>>>> can volunteer for the release as an RM and plan for cutting a release > >>>>>>> branch on 30 September (and release the artifacts about 3-4 days after > >>>>>>> that). > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> WDYT? > >>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>> Ishan > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Adrien > >>>>>> > >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) > >>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >>> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
