+1, Ignacio. Please feel free to do the needful, I'll wait until this is resolved.
+1, Jan. Sure, I think we should get it in! On Thu, 10 Oct, 2019, 5:45 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ishan, > > I pushed the fix to branch_8_3. > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 11:27 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Ishan, I'd like to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13665 >> included, since without it Solr won't work with SSL against Zookeeper. >> >> -- >> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect >> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com >> >> 10. okt. 2019 kl. 11:45 skrev Ignacio Vera <[email protected]>: >> >> Hi Ishan, >> >> Thanks for taking care of the release. We have a blocker in Lucene (see >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8920). I remember that was >> an issue for the 8.2.0 release and it was reverted and naked as a blocker >> for this release. Maybe we should completely reverted until we have a >> better solution? let see what Mike thinks about it. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Ignacio >> >> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 4:51 PM Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I also had a customer complaining about this. I have the feeling it also >>> happens from time to time during inter node comm, which uses solrj, too. >>> >>> Uwe >>> >>> Am October 9, 2019 1:38:00 PM UTC schrieb Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>> [email protected]>: >>>> >>>> +1, Dat! Please go ahead. >>>> >>>> On Wed, 9 Oct, 2019, 2:33 PM Andrzej Białecki, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> It’s marked as Minor in Jira, but after reading the description it >>>>> sounds scary - IMHO it should be at least well investigated before 8.3 in >>>>> order to determine whether it causes real damage (apart from looking scary >>>>> and filling the logs). >>>>> >>>>> +1 from me. >>>>> >>>>> On 9 Oct 2019, at 10:48, Đạt Cao Mạnh <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Ishan, guys >>>>> >>>>> I want to include the fix for >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13293 in this release. >>>>> Hoping that is ok! >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:02 PM Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> ASF Jenkins Jobs also reconfigured. >>>>>> >>>>>> I left the 8.2 Refguide job in the queue (I cloned it), not sure if >>>>>> that one is still needed. All other jobs are 8.3 now. >>>>>> >>>>>> Uwe >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- >>>>>> Uwe Schindler >>>>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >>>>>> https://www.thetaphi.de >>>>>> eMail: [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> > -----Original Message----- >>>>>> > From: Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> >>>>>> > Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 4:49 PM >>>>>> > To: [email protected] >>>>>> > Subject: RE: 8.3 release >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Policeman Jenkins builds and tests 8.3 for Windows and Linux. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Uwe >>>>>> > >>>>>> > ----- >>>>>> > Uwe Schindler >>>>>> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >>>>>> > https://www.thetaphi.de >>>>>> > eMail: [email protected] >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > -----Original Message----- >>>>>> > > From: Ishan Chattopadhyaya <[email protected]> >>>>>> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 4:32 PM >>>>>> > > To: Lucene Dev <[email protected]>; Uwe Schindler >>>>>> > > <[email protected]>; Steve Rowe <[email protected]> >>>>>> > > Subject: Re: 8.3 release >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > I've cut the 8.3 branch. Please feel free to push in any bug fix. >>>>>> For >>>>>> > > any feature, please let me know to see how we can accommodate it >>>>>> > > safely. >>>>>> > > I'm planning to get myself familiarized with what I need to do >>>>>> for the >>>>>> > > ref guide release (simultaneously with the binary release). So, >>>>>> most >>>>>> > > likely, I'll be able to build artifacts in another week's time. >>>>>> > > @Uwe Schindler / @Steve Rowe would it be possible to please >>>>>> create a >>>>>> > > Jenkins branch for 8.3? >>>>>> > > Thanks, >>>>>> > > Ishan >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 4:17 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >>>>>> > > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > I'll cut the branch in 12-24 hours from now. If someone has >>>>>> anything >>>>>> > > > to put into branch_8x now, please feel free. >>>>>> > > > If someone has a non-bugfix issue that they want to push in to >>>>>> 8.3 >>>>>> > > > after the branch cut, but you're sure it will not disrupt the >>>>>> > > > stability of the release, please let me know and we can discuss >>>>>> on a >>>>>> > > > case-by-case basis. >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 8:50 PM Mikhail Khludnev < >>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>> > > wrote: >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > Excuse me. I have to recall this message regarding SOLR-13764. >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:56 PM Mikhail Khludnev >>>>>> > > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>> > > > >> Ishan, thanks for update. >>>>>> > > > >> May I propose to hold it for this week, beside of the severe >>>>>> issues you >>>>>> > > mentioned, I'd like to drop pretty neat JSON Query parser for >>>>>> Interval >>>>>> > > Queries https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13764 this >>>>>> week. >>>>>> > > > >> >>>>>> > > > >> пн, 30 сент. 2019 г., 18:04 Ishan Chattopadhyaya >>>>>> > > <[email protected]>: >>>>>> > > > >>> >>>>>> > > > >>> * Due to some unfinished and half merged work in >>>>>> SOLR-13661, we >>>>>> > are >>>>>> > > in >>>>>> > > > >>> a difficult position for a branch cutting today (as I had >>>>>> proposed). >>>>>> > > > >>> I have documented the options on how to deal with that >>>>>> immediately >>>>>> > > in >>>>>> > > > >>> that issue. I'll work to resolve the situation and cut a >>>>>> branch as >>>>>> > > > >>> soon as possible. >>>>>> > > > >>> * SOLR-13677 is also a blocker for release, but I can >>>>>> proceed with the >>>>>> > > > >>> branch cutting. >>>>>> > > > >>> >>>>>> > > > >>> I'll take a look at the ref guide's simultaneous release as >>>>>> we reach >>>>>> > > > >>> closer to building the artifacts. >>>>>> > > > >>> Thanks, >>>>>> > > > >>> Ishan >>>>>> > > > >>> >>>>>> > > > >>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:06 PM Cassandra Targett >>>>>> > > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> > > > >>> > >>>>>> > > > >>> > As I’ve mentioned to some of you over the past couple of >>>>>> weeks, I >>>>>> > > want to propose that we don’t “release” the Ref Guide at all the >>>>>> way we >>>>>> > have >>>>>> > > been doing it. >>>>>> > > > >>> > >>>>>> > > > >>> > It deserves a separate thread, which since it’s come up a >>>>>> few times >>>>>> > > this week I should start now, but in essence, my idea is to no >>>>>> longer treat >>>>>> > the >>>>>> > > PDF as a release artifact that requires a vote, and publish the >>>>>> HTML as our >>>>>> > > primary version of the Ref Guide in effectively the same way we >>>>>> publish the >>>>>> > > javadocs (at the same time as the binary artifacts). >>>>>> > > > >>> > >>>>>> > > > >>> > Instead of highjacking this thread with that discussion >>>>>> since it has >>>>>> > > several aspects, let me send another mail on it where I can flesh >>>>>> it out >>>>>> > more >>>>>> > > and we can discuss there. I have the mail mostly queued up and >>>>>> ready to >>>>>> > go >>>>>> > > already. >>>>>> > > > >>> > >>>>>> > > > >>> > Cassandra >>>>>> > > > >>> > On Sep 18, 2019, 10:23 AM -0500, Gus Heck >>>>>> > <[email protected]>, >>>>>> > > wrote: >>>>>> > > > >>> > >>>>>> > > > >>> > I learned recently that it's actually all documented >>>>>> here: >>>>>> > > >>>>>> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/how-to-contribute.html#ref- >>>>>> > > guide-publication-process >>>>>> > > > >>> > >>>>>> > > > >>> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 7:31 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >>>>>> > > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> > > > >>> >> >>>>>> > > > >>> >> Hi Adrien, >>>>>> > > > >>> >> Indeed, meant to write about starting a vote. >>>>>> > > > >>> >> >>>>>> > > > >>> >> @Gus, I'll have to let Cassandra weigh in on this one as >>>>>> I'm not >>>>>> > very >>>>>> > > familiar with the ref guide release process. >>>>>> > > > >>> >> >>>>>> > > > >>> >> Regards, >>>>>> > > > >>> >> Ishan >>>>>> > > > >>> >> >>>>>> > > > >>> >> On Mon, 16 Sep, 2019, 7:28 PM Adrien Grand, >>>>>> > > <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> +1 to start working on 8.3 >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> Did you mean "start a vote" when you wrote "release the >>>>>> > > artifacts"? It >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> got me wondering because I don't think we frequently >>>>>> managed >>>>>> > to >>>>>> > > go >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> from cutting a branch to releasing artifacts in so >>>>>> little time in the >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> past. >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 5:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > Hi all, >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > We have a lot of unreleased features and fixes. I >>>>>> propose that >>>>>> > we >>>>>> > > cut >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > a 8.3 branch in two weeks (in order to have >>>>>> sufficient time to >>>>>> > > bake in >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > all in-progress features). If there are no objections >>>>>> to doing so, I >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > can volunteer for the release as an RM and plan for >>>>>> cutting a >>>>>> > > release >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > branch on 30 September (and release the artifacts >>>>>> about 3-4 >>>>>> > days >>>>>> > > after >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > that). >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > WDYT? >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > Regards, >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > Ishan >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> -- >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> Adrien >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >>>>>> > > > >>> > >>>>>> > > > >>> > >>>>>> > > > >>> > -- >>>>>> > > > >>> > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>>>> > > > >>> > http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>>>> > > > >>> >>>>>> > > > >>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> > > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> > > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> > > > >>> >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > -- >>>>>> > > > > Sincerely yours >>>>>> > > > > Mikhail Khludnev >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> *Best regards,* >>>>> *Cao Mạnh Đạt* >>>>> *E-mail: [email protected] <[email protected]>* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> -- >>> Uwe Schindler >>> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen >>> https://www.thetaphi.de >>> >> >> > > -- > *Best regards,* > *Cao Mạnh Đạt* > *E-mail: [email protected] <[email protected]>* >
