Sure, Noble, thanks! Next time, please use a single commit to revert such features (you just used up 3 commits). branch_8_3's history is now littered with SOLR-13821 commits and reverts that shouldn't have been there :-)
Thanks, Jan! On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 12:17 AM Noble Paul <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > I'll revert the package store commits related to SOLR-13821 in the 8.3 > branch. It is supposed to be used by the (SOLR-13822) and it is not a > part of the 8.3 release. > --Noble > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 5:22 AM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Ishan, > > > > The release is no longer blocked on LUCENE-8920. > > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 6:18 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > +1, Ignacio. Please feel free to do the needful, I'll wait until this is > > > resolved. > > > > > > +1, Jan. Sure, I think we should get it in! > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 10 Oct, 2019, 5:45 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh, <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi Ishan, > > >> > > >> I pushed the fix to branch_8_3. > > >> > > >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 11:27 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Ishan, I'd like to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13665 > > >>> included, since without it Solr won't work with SSL against Zookeeper. > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect > > >>> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com > > >>> > > >>> 10. okt. 2019 kl. 11:45 skrev Ignacio Vera <[email protected]>: > > >>> > > >>> Hi Ishan, > > >>> > > >>> Thanks for taking care of the release. We have a blocker in Lucene (see > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8920). I remember that was > > >>> an issue for the 8.2.0 release and it was reverted and naked as a > > >>> blocker for this release. Maybe we should completely reverted until we > > >>> have a better solution? let see what Mike thinks about it. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> > > >>> Ignacio > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 4:51 PM Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Hi, > > >>>> > > >>>> I also had a customer complaining about this. I have the feeling it > > >>>> also happens from time to time during inter node comm, which uses > > >>>> solrj, too. > > >>>> > > >>>> Uwe > > >>>> > > >>>> Am October 9, 2019 1:38:00 PM UTC schrieb Ishan Chattopadhyaya > > >>>> <[email protected]>: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> +1, Dat! Please go ahead. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, 9 Oct, 2019, 2:33 PM Andrzej Białecki, <[email protected]> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> It’s marked as Minor in Jira, but after reading the description it > > >>>>>> sounds scary - IMHO it should be at least well investigated before > > >>>>>> 8.3 in order to determine whether it causes real damage (apart from > > >>>>>> looking scary and filling the logs). > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> +1 from me. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On 9 Oct 2019, at 10:48, Đạt Cao Mạnh <[email protected]> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Hi Ishan, guys > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I want to include the fix for > > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13293 in this release. > > >>>>>> Hoping that is ok! > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Thanks! > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:02 PM Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> ASF Jenkins Jobs also reconfigured. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I left the 8.2 Refguide job in the queue (I cloned it), not sure if > > >>>>>>> that one is still needed. All other jobs are 8.3 now. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Uwe > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> ----- > > >>>>>>> Uwe Schindler > > >>>>>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > >>>>>>> https://www.thetaphi.de > > >>>>>>> eMail: [email protected] > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > -----Original Message----- > > >>>>>>> > From: Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> > > >>>>>>> > Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 4:49 PM > > >>>>>>> > To: [email protected] > > >>>>>>> > Subject: RE: 8.3 release > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > Policeman Jenkins builds and tests 8.3 for Windows and Linux. > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > Uwe > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > ----- > > >>>>>>> > Uwe Schindler > > >>>>>>> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > >>>>>>> > https://www.thetaphi.de > > >>>>>>> > eMail: [email protected] > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > -----Original Message----- > > >>>>>>> > > From: Ishan Chattopadhyaya <[email protected]> > > >>>>>>> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 4:32 PM > > >>>>>>> > > To: Lucene Dev <[email protected]>; Uwe Schindler > > >>>>>>> > > <[email protected]>; Steve Rowe <[email protected]> > > >>>>>>> > > Subject: Re: 8.3 release > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > I've cut the 8.3 branch. Please feel free to push in any bug > > >>>>>>> > > fix. For > > >>>>>>> > > any feature, please let me know to see how we can accommodate it > > >>>>>>> > > safely. > > >>>>>>> > > I'm planning to get myself familiarized with what I need to do > > >>>>>>> > > for the > > >>>>>>> > > ref guide release (simultaneously with the binary release). So, > > >>>>>>> > > most > > >>>>>>> > > likely, I'll be able to build artifacts in another week's time. > > >>>>>>> > > @Uwe Schindler / @Steve Rowe would it be possible to please > > >>>>>>> > > create a > > >>>>>>> > > Jenkins branch for 8.3? > > >>>>>>> > > Thanks, > > >>>>>>> > > Ishan > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 4:17 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > > >>>>>>> > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > I'll cut the branch in 12-24 hours from now. If someone has > > >>>>>>> > > > anything > > >>>>>>> > > > to put into branch_8x now, please feel free. > > >>>>>>> > > > If someone has a non-bugfix issue that they want to push in > > >>>>>>> > > > to 8.3 > > >>>>>>> > > > after the branch cut, but you're sure it will not disrupt the > > >>>>>>> > > > stability of the release, please let me know and we can > > >>>>>>> > > > discuss on a > > >>>>>>> > > > case-by-case basis. > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 8:50 PM Mikhail Khludnev > > >>>>>>> > > > <[email protected]> > > >>>>>>> > > wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > Excuse me. I have to recall this message regarding > > >>>>>>> > > > > SOLR-13764. > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:56 PM Mikhail Khludnev > > >>>>>>> > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> > > > >> Ishan, thanks for update. > > >>>>>>> > > > >> May I propose to hold it for this week, beside of the > > >>>>>>> > > > >> severe issues you > > >>>>>>> > > mentioned, I'd like to drop pretty neat JSON Query parser for > > >>>>>>> > > Interval > > >>>>>>> > > Queries https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13764 this > > >>>>>>> > > week. > > >>>>>>> > > > >> > > >>>>>>> > > > >> пн, 30 сент. 2019 г., 18:04 Ishan Chattopadhyaya > > >>>>>>> > > <[email protected]>: > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> * Due to some unfinished and half merged work in > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> SOLR-13661, we > > >>>>>>> > are > > >>>>>>> > > in > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> a difficult position for a branch cutting today (as I had > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> proposed). > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> I have documented the options on how to deal with that > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> immediately > > >>>>>>> > > in > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> that issue. I'll work to resolve the situation and cut a > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> branch as > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> soon as possible. > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> * SOLR-13677 is also a blocker for release, but I can > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> proceed with the > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> branch cutting. > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> I'll take a look at the ref guide's simultaneous release > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> as we reach > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> closer to building the artifacts. > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> Ishan > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:06 PM Cassandra Targett > > >>>>>>> > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > As I’ve mentioned to some of you over the past couple > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > of weeks, I > > >>>>>>> > > want to propose that we don’t “release” the Ref Guide at all > > >>>>>>> > > the way we > > >>>>>>> > have > > >>>>>>> > > been doing it. > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > It deserves a separate thread, which since it’s come up > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > a few times > > >>>>>>> > > this week I should start now, but in essence, my idea is to no > > >>>>>>> > > longer treat > > >>>>>>> > the > > >>>>>>> > > PDF as a release artifact that requires a vote, and publish the > > >>>>>>> > > HTML as our > > >>>>>>> > > primary version of the Ref Guide in effectively the same way we > > >>>>>>> > > publish the > > >>>>>>> > > javadocs (at the same time as the binary artifacts). > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > Instead of highjacking this thread with that discussion > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > since it has > > >>>>>>> > > several aspects, let me send another mail on it where I can > > >>>>>>> > > flesh it out > > >>>>>>> > more > > >>>>>>> > > and we can discuss there. I have the mail mostly queued up and > > >>>>>>> > > ready to > > >>>>>>> > go > > >>>>>>> > > already. > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > Cassandra > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > On Sep 18, 2019, 10:23 AM -0500, Gus Heck > > >>>>>>> > <[email protected]>, > > >>>>>>> > > wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > I learned recently that it's actually all documented > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > here: > > >>>>>>> > > https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/how-to-contribute.html#ref- > > >>>>>>> > > guide-publication-process > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 7:31 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > > >>>>>>> > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >> > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >> Hi Adrien, > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >> Indeed, meant to write about starting a vote. > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >> > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >> @Gus, I'll have to let Cassandra weigh in on this one > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >> as I'm not > > >>>>>>> > very > > >>>>>>> > > familiar with the ref guide release process. > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >> > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >> Regards, > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >> Ishan > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >> > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >> On Mon, 16 Sep, 2019, 7:28 PM Adrien Grand, > > >>>>>>> > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> +1 to start working on 8.3 > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> Did you mean "start a vote" when you wrote "release > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> the > > >>>>>>> > > artifacts"? It > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> got me wondering because I don't think we frequently > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> managed > > >>>>>>> > to > > >>>>>>> > > go > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> from cutting a branch to releasing artifacts in so > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> little time in the > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> past. > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 5:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > Hi all, > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > We have a lot of unreleased features and fixes. I > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > propose that > > >>>>>>> > we > > >>>>>>> > > cut > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > a 8.3 branch in two weeks (in order to have > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > sufficient time to > > >>>>>>> > > bake in > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > all in-progress features). If there are no > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > objections to doing so, I > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > can volunteer for the release as an RM and plan for > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > cutting a > > >>>>>>> > > release > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > branch on 30 September (and release the artifacts > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > about 3-4 > > >>>>>>> > days > > >>>>>>> > > after > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > that). > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > WDYT? > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > Regards, > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > Ishan > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > [email protected] > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > [email protected] > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> -- > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> Adrien > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> [email protected] > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> [email protected] > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > -- > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > http://www.the111shift.com (play) > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> [email protected] > > >>>>>>> > > > >>> > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > -- > > >>>>>>> > > > > Sincerely yours > > >>>>>>> > > > > Mikhail Khludnev > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > >>>>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > >>>>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> Best regards, > > >>>>>> Cao Mạnh Đạt > > >>>>>> E-mail: [email protected] > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Uwe Schindler > > >>>> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen > > >>>> https://www.thetaphi.de > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Best regards, > > >> Cao Mạnh Đạt > > >> E-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > -- > > Adrien > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------- > Noble Paul > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
