Hi,
I'll revert the package store commits related to SOLR-13821 in the 8.3
branch. It is supposed to be used by the (SOLR-13822) and it is not a
part of the 8.3 release.
--Noble

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 5:22 AM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Ishan,
>
> The release is no longer blocked on LUCENE-8920.
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 6:18 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > +1, Ignacio. Please feel free to do the needful, I'll wait until this is 
> > resolved.
> >
> > +1, Jan. Sure, I think we should get it in!
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Oct, 2019, 5:45 PM Đạt Cao Mạnh, <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Ishan,
> >>
> >> I pushed the fix to branch_8_3.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 11:27 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Ishan, I'd like to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13665 
> >>> included, since without it Solr won't work with SSL against Zookeeper.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> >>> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> >>>
> >>> 10. okt. 2019 kl. 11:45 skrev Ignacio Vera <[email protected]>:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Ishan,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for taking care of the release. We have a blocker in Lucene (see 
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8920). I remember that was 
> >>> an issue for the 8.2.0 release and it was reverted and naked as a blocker 
> >>> for this release. Maybe we should completely reverted until we have a 
> >>> better solution? let see what Mike thinks about it.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Ignacio
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 4:51 PM Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I also had a customer complaining about this. I have the feeling it also 
> >>>> happens from time to time during inter node comm, which uses solrj, too.
> >>>>
> >>>> Uwe
> >>>>
> >>>> Am October 9, 2019 1:38:00 PM UTC schrieb Ishan Chattopadhyaya 
> >>>> <[email protected]>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +1, Dat! Please go ahead.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, 9 Oct, 2019, 2:33 PM Andrzej Białecki, <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It’s marked as Minor in Jira, but after reading the description it 
> >>>>>> sounds scary - IMHO it should be at least well investigated before 8.3 
> >>>>>> in order to determine whether it causes real damage (apart from 
> >>>>>> looking scary and filling the logs).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 from me.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 9 Oct 2019, at 10:48, Đạt Cao Mạnh <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Ishan, guys
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I want to include the fix for 
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13293 in this release. 
> >>>>>> Hoping that is ok!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:02 PM Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ASF Jenkins Jobs also reconfigured.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I left the 8.2 Refguide job in the queue (I cloned it), not sure if 
> >>>>>>> that one is still needed. All other jobs are 8.3 now.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Uwe
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -----
> >>>>>>> Uwe Schindler
> >>>>>>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> >>>>>>> https://www.thetaphi.de
> >>>>>>> eMail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> > -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>> > From: Uwe Schindler <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>> > Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 4:49 PM
> >>>>>>> > To: [email protected]
> >>>>>>> > Subject: RE: 8.3 release
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > Policeman Jenkins builds and tests 8.3 for Windows and Linux.
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > Uwe
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > -----
> >>>>>>> > Uwe Schindler
> >>>>>>> > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> >>>>>>> > https://www.thetaphi.de
> >>>>>>> > eMail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > > -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>> > > From: Ishan Chattopadhyaya <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 4:32 PM
> >>>>>>> > > To: Lucene Dev <[email protected]>; Uwe Schindler
> >>>>>>> > > <[email protected]>; Steve Rowe <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>> > > Subject: Re: 8.3 release
> >>>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > I've cut the 8.3 branch. Please feel free to push in any bug fix. 
> >>>>>>> > > For
> >>>>>>> > > any feature, please let me know to see how we can accommodate it
> >>>>>>> > > safely.
> >>>>>>> > > I'm planning to get myself familiarized with what I need to do 
> >>>>>>> > > for the
> >>>>>>> > > ref guide release (simultaneously with the binary release). So, 
> >>>>>>> > > most
> >>>>>>> > > likely, I'll be able to build artifacts in another week's time.
> >>>>>>> > > @Uwe Schindler / @Steve Rowe  would it be possible to please 
> >>>>>>> > > create a
> >>>>>>> > > Jenkins branch for 8.3?
> >>>>>>> > > Thanks,
> >>>>>>> > > Ishan
> >>>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 4:17 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> >>>>>>> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > I'll cut the branch in 12-24 hours from now. If someone has 
> >>>>>>> > > > anything
> >>>>>>> > > > to put into branch_8x now, please feel free.
> >>>>>>> > > > If someone has a non-bugfix issue that they want to push in to 
> >>>>>>> > > > 8.3
> >>>>>>> > > > after the branch cut, but you're sure it will not disrupt the
> >>>>>>> > > > stability of the release, please let me know and we can discuss 
> >>>>>>> > > > on a
> >>>>>>> > > > case-by-case basis.
> >>>>>>> > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 8:50 PM Mikhail Khludnev 
> >>>>>>> > > > <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>> > > wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > > Excuse me. I have to recall this message regarding SOLR-13764.
> >>>>>>> > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 10:56 PM Mikhail Khludnev
> >>>>>>> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >> Ishan, thanks for update.
> >>>>>>> > > > >> May I propose to hold it for this week, beside of the severe 
> >>>>>>> > > > >> issues you
> >>>>>>> > > mentioned, I'd like to drop pretty neat JSON Query parser for 
> >>>>>>> > > Interval
> >>>>>>> > > Queries https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13764 this 
> >>>>>>> > > week.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >> пн, 30 сент. 2019 г., 18:04 Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> >>>>>>> > > <[email protected]>:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> * Due to some unfinished and half merged work in 
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> SOLR-13661, we
> >>>>>>> > are
> >>>>>>> > > in
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> a difficult position for a branch cutting today (as I had 
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> proposed).
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> I have documented the options on how to deal with that 
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> immediately
> >>>>>>> > > in
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> that issue. I'll work to resolve the situation and cut a 
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> branch as
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> soon as possible.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> * SOLR-13677 is also a blocker for release, but I can 
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> proceed with the
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> branch cutting.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> I'll take a look at the ref guide's simultaneous release as 
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> we reach
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> closer to building the artifacts.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> Ishan
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:06 PM Cassandra Targett
> >>>>>>> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> > As I’ve mentioned to some of you over the past couple of 
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> > weeks, I
> >>>>>>> > > want to propose that we don’t “release” the Ref Guide at all the 
> >>>>>>> > > way we
> >>>>>>> > have
> >>>>>>> > > been doing it.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> > It deserves a separate thread, which since it’s come up a 
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> > few times
> >>>>>>> > > this week I should start now, but in essence, my idea is to no 
> >>>>>>> > > longer treat
> >>>>>>> > the
> >>>>>>> > > PDF as a release artifact that requires a vote, and publish the 
> >>>>>>> > > HTML as our
> >>>>>>> > > primary version of the Ref Guide in effectively the same way we 
> >>>>>>> > > publish the
> >>>>>>> > > javadocs (at the same time as the binary artifacts).
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> > Instead of highjacking this thread with that discussion 
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> > since it has
> >>>>>>> > > several aspects, let me send another mail on it where I can flesh 
> >>>>>>> > > it out
> >>>>>>> > more
> >>>>>>> > > and we can discuss there. I have the mail mostly queued up and 
> >>>>>>> > > ready to
> >>>>>>> > go
> >>>>>>> > > already.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> > Cassandra
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> > On Sep 18, 2019, 10:23 AM -0500, Gus Heck
> >>>>>>> > <[email protected]>,
> >>>>>>> > > wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> > I learned recently that it's actually all  documented 
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> > here:
> >>>>>>> > > https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/how-to-contribute.html#ref-
> >>>>>>> > > guide-publication-process
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 7:31 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> >>>>>>> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >> Hi Adrien,
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >> Indeed, meant to write about starting a vote.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >> @Gus, I'll have to let Cassandra weigh in on this one as 
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >> I'm not
> >>>>>>> > very
> >>>>>>> > > familiar with the ref guide release process.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >> Regards,
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >> Ishan
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >> On Mon, 16 Sep, 2019, 7:28 PM Adrien Grand,
> >>>>>>> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> +1 to start working on 8.3
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> Did you mean "start a vote" when you wrote "release the
> >>>>>>> > > artifacts"? It
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> got me wondering because I don't think we frequently 
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> managed
> >>>>>>> > to
> >>>>>>> > > go
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> from cutting a branch to releasing artifacts in so 
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> little time in the
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> past.
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 5:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > Hi all,
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > We have a lot of unreleased features and fixes. I 
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > propose that
> >>>>>>> > we
> >>>>>>> > > cut
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > a 8.3 branch in two weeks (in order to have 
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > sufficient time to
> >>>>>>> > > bake in
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > all in-progress features). If there are no objections 
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > to doing so, I
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > can volunteer for the release as an RM and plan for 
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > cutting a
> >>>>>>> > > release
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > branch on 30 September (and release the artifacts 
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > about 3-4
> >>>>>>> > days
> >>>>>>> > > after
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > that).
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > WDYT?
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > Regards,
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > Ishan
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > [email protected]
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> > [email protected]
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> --
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> Adrien
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> >
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> > --
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> > http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> > http://www.the111shift.com (play)
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>> > > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>> > > > >>>
> >>>>>>> > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > >
> >>>>>>> > > > > --
> >>>>>>> > > > > Sincerely yours
> >>>>>>> > > > > Mikhail Khludnev
> >>>>>>> > >
> >>>>>>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>> Cao Mạnh Đạt
> >>>>>> E-mail: [email protected]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Uwe Schindler
> >>>> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
> >>>> https://www.thetaphi.de
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best regards,
> >> Cao Mạnh Đạt
> >> E-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>
> --
> Adrien
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to