We can use JIRA to annotate what we want to do for 9x. I know from experience it can be a bit aspirational and that's okay. Eventually reality will set in and we'll remove the fix-version accordingly.
~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 4:46 PM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: > One Lucene issue I'd like to have in 9.0 is > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9047, which is about making > our directory abstractions little-endian instead of big-endian. It would be > breaking enough that it should be done in a major. > > On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 3:35 PM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> What are people’s thoughts about Solr 9.0? It’d be a little faster than >> our recent cadence, the last two major releases were about 18 months after >> the one before and we released Solr 8.0 last March. >> >> Besides the usual reasons, there are two drivers I can think of: >> >> 1> We can drop Java 8 compatibility. >> 2> We can migrate to exclusively use Gradle as the build system. >> >> The Gradle build isn’t complete yet, although it’s maturing pretty >> quickly (and Dawid has yeoman’s duty!). My question isn’t so much “should >> we start the release process for Solr 9.0 next week” as it is “What >> milestones should we reach before starting the 9.0 release process?” >> >> Maybe something as simple as “Start the 9.0 process a month after >> removing the ant components of the build system”. >> >> And a reasonable answer at this point is “it’s way too early to even talk >> about it”. >> >> Erick >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> > > -- > Adrien >
