bq. it seems like a huge misuse of JIRA I disagree, but not enough to bikeshed. I’m looking for the most efficient way to get the scope of what we want to include in 9.0 defined.
Wading through 134 issues is tedious, WDYT about a “future” tag? Once we go through those 134 issues and change the ones we know we won’t get to the process will be more tractable. We could make the ones we want to include in 9.0 “blockers”. Point is mostly to get a way to measure progress. The last thing I want to do is wade through 134 issues making a judgement call on each one multiple times between now and release. > On Feb 2, 2020, at 4:48 PM, David Smiley <[email protected]> wrote: > > We can use JIRA to annotate what we want to do for 9x. I know from > experience it can be a bit aspirational and that's okay. Eventually reality > will set in and we'll remove the fix-version accordingly. > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 4:46 PM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: > One Lucene issue I'd like to have in 9.0 is > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9047, which is about making our > directory abstractions little-endian instead of big-endian. It would be > breaking enough that it should be done in a major. > > On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 3:35 PM Erick Erickson <[email protected]> wrote: > What are people’s thoughts about Solr 9.0? It’d be a little faster than our > recent cadence, the last two major releases were about 18 months after the > one before and we released Solr 8.0 last March. > > Besides the usual reasons, there are two drivers I can think of: > > 1> We can drop Java 8 compatibility. > 2> We can migrate to exclusively use Gradle as the build system. > > The Gradle build isn’t complete yet, although it’s maturing pretty quickly > (and Dawid has yeoman’s duty!). My question isn’t so much “should we start > the release process for Solr 9.0 next week” as it is “What milestones should > we reach before starting the 9.0 release process?” > > Maybe something as simple as “Start the 9.0 process a month after removing > the ant components of the build system”. > > And a reasonable answer at this point is “it’s way too early to even talk > about it”. > > Erick > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > -- > Adrien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
