Yeah. Could you please upgrade the JDK first? I suspect javadoc
generation has changed in between and something in there is causing
invalid/ different HTML to be emitted for you.

D.

On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 9:24 AM Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> such ancient versions of openjdk probably have bugs generating the javadocs.
>
> On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 3:04 AM Gautam Worah <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > openjdk 11 2018-09-25
> > OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11+28)
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 11:27 PM Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Can you check which exact Java version you are using? (java -version)?
> >>
> >> On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 3:55 AM Gautam Worah <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I tried running the `python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC4-rev-0b18b3b965cedaf5eb129aa41243a44c83ca826d`
> >> >  command directly on Mac OS X and RHEL flavored Linux and it fails on a 
> >> > documentation task for me.
> >> >
> >> > ```
> >> > > Task :lucene:documentation:checkBrokenLinks
> >> >
> >> > Crawl/parse...
> >> >
> >> > Verify...
> >> >
> >> > file:///private/tmp/smoke_lucene_9.0.0_0b18b3b965cedaf5eb129aa41243a44c83ca826d_1/unpack/lucene-9.0.0/lucene/documentation/build/site/suggest/org/apache/lucene/search/suggest/fst/ExternalRefSorter.html
> >> >   BROKEN LINK: 
> >> > file:///private/tmp/smoke_lucene_9.0.0_0b18b3b965cedaf5eb129aa41243a44c83ca826d_1/unpack/lucene-9.0.0/lucene/documentation/build/site/core/org/apache/lucene/search/suggest.fst.ExternalRefSorter.ByteSequenceIterator.html
> >> >   BROKEN LINK: 
> >> > file:///private/tmp/smoke_lucene_9.0.0_0b18b3b965cedaf5eb129aa41243a44c83ca826d_1/unpack/lucene-9.0.0/lucene/documentation/build/site/core/org/apache/lucene/search/suggest.fst.ExternalRefSorter.ByteSequenceIterator.html
> >> > ...
> >> > ```
> >> > (both the failed builds had a lot of common broken links)
> >> >
> >> > The standalone task "./gradlew --no-daemon check -p 
> >> > lucene/documentation" also fails for me when executed separately. I 
> >> > suspect it has something to do with my own setup and not the release 
> >> > itself..
> >> > I tried clicking through those broken error links and they indeed do not 
> >> > exist (other javadoc links work fine). Has anyone else seen these kinds 
> >> > of errors?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 1:23 PM Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> 
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I feel I kind of wimped out of being RM, so thank you very much for
> >> >> stepping up Adrien!
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 3:30 PM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks Anshum, Dawid and others for the support!
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Le jeu. 2 déc. 2021 à 20:39, Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> a 
> >> >> > écrit :
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> SUCCESS! [0:17:10.950384]
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> +1.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Sorry for all the extra work, Adrien.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Dawid
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 5:56 PM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> 
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 9.0.0
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> >> >> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC4-rev-0b18b3b965cedaf5eb129aa41243a44c83ca826d
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> >> >> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC4-rev-0b18b3b965cedaf5eb129aa41243a44c83ca826d
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> The vote will be open until 2021-12-06 08:00 UTC.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> [ ] +1  approve
> >> >> >>> [ ] +0  no opinion
> >> >> >>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Here is my +1
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> --
> >> >> >>> Adrien
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to