It works fine with java 11. Just not your super-old super-buggy java 11 :) I tested with this one:
openjdk version "11.0.10" 2021-01-19 OpenJDK Runtime Environment AdoptOpenJDK (build 11.0.10+9) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM AdoptOpenJDK (build 11.0.10+9, mixed mode) On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 4:51 AM Gautam Worah <[email protected]> wrote: > > SUCCESS! [0:16:56.988897] > Ran it with JDK 17! Thanks for the suggestion > > It is a bit confusing though, that our build.gradle says JDK 11 is the > minimum to compile and run Lucene but we require newer versions to test > javadocs > > > > On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 12:26 AM Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Yeah. Could you please upgrade the JDK first? I suspect javadoc >> generation has changed in between and something in there is causing >> invalid/ different HTML to be emitted for you. >> >> D. >> >> On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 9:24 AM Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > such ancient versions of openjdk probably have bugs generating the >> > javadocs. >> > >> > On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 3:04 AM Gautam Worah <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > openjdk 11 2018-09-25 >> > > OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11+28) >> > > >> > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 11:27 PM Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > >> >> > >> Can you check which exact Java version you are using? (java -version)? >> > >> >> > >> On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 3:55 AM Gautam Worah <[email protected]> >> > >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > I tried running the `python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py >> > >> > \ >> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC4-rev-0b18b3b965cedaf5eb129aa41243a44c83ca826d` >> > >> > command directly on Mac OS X and RHEL flavored Linux and it fails on >> > >> > a documentation task for me. >> > >> > >> > >> > ``` >> > >> > > Task :lucene:documentation:checkBrokenLinks >> > >> > >> > >> > Crawl/parse... >> > >> > >> > >> > Verify... >> > >> > >> > >> > file:///private/tmp/smoke_lucene_9.0.0_0b18b3b965cedaf5eb129aa41243a44c83ca826d_1/unpack/lucene-9.0.0/lucene/documentation/build/site/suggest/org/apache/lucene/search/suggest/fst/ExternalRefSorter.html >> > >> > BROKEN LINK: >> > >> > file:///private/tmp/smoke_lucene_9.0.0_0b18b3b965cedaf5eb129aa41243a44c83ca826d_1/unpack/lucene-9.0.0/lucene/documentation/build/site/core/org/apache/lucene/search/suggest.fst.ExternalRefSorter.ByteSequenceIterator.html >> > >> > BROKEN LINK: >> > >> > file:///private/tmp/smoke_lucene_9.0.0_0b18b3b965cedaf5eb129aa41243a44c83ca826d_1/unpack/lucene-9.0.0/lucene/documentation/build/site/core/org/apache/lucene/search/suggest.fst.ExternalRefSorter.ByteSequenceIterator.html >> > >> > ... >> > >> > ``` >> > >> > (both the failed builds had a lot of common broken links) >> > >> > >> > >> > The standalone task "./gradlew --no-daemon check -p >> > >> > lucene/documentation" also fails for me when executed separately. I >> > >> > suspect it has something to do with my own setup and not the release >> > >> > itself.. >> > >> > I tried clicking through those broken error links and they indeed do >> > >> > not exist (other javadoc links work fine). Has anyone else seen these >> > >> > kinds of errors? >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 1:23 PM Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> >> >> > >> >> I feel I kind of wimped out of being RM, so thank you very much for >> > >> >> stepping up Adrien! >> > >> >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 3:30 PM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> >> > >> >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > Thanks Anshum, Dawid and others for the support! >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > Le jeu. 2 déc. 2021 à 20:39, Dawid Weiss <[email protected]> a >> > >> >> > écrit : >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> SUCCESS! [0:17:10.950384] >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> +1. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> Sorry for all the extra work, Adrien. >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> Dawid >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 5:56 PM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> >> > >> >> >> wrote: >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> Please vote for release candidate 4 for Lucene 9.0.0 >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> > >> >> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC4-rev-0b18b3b965cedaf5eb129aa41243a44c83ca826d >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >> > >> >> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC4-rev-0b18b3b965cedaf5eb129aa41243a44c83ca826d >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> The vote will be open until 2021-12-06 08:00 UTC. >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> [ ] +1 approve >> > >> >> >>> [ ] +0 no opinion >> > >> >> >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> Here is my +1 >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> -- >> > >> >> >>> Adrien >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > >> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> >> >>> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
