I have back-ported https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/16450 to the 10.5.1 branch.
Thanks Ignacio! > On 5 Aug 2026, at 12:23, Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> wrote: > > OK, I just did that, thanks > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 7:12 AM Ignacio Vera <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Sure Michael, >> >> The fix looks well self-contained (and tiny), please feel free to backport >> it to branch 10.5. >> >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 11:36 AM Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> That bugfix was in https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/16403/ >>> (commit: 2459ab7749c6062d0ee5a946430745c46cd9fda4) >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 6:33 AM Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Is it possible to also include >>>> >>>> * GITHUB#16400: Restore HNSW graph reuse during merges under per-field >>>> vectors formats, >>>> including the default codec. Since 10.4.0 the merger tested the >>>> per-field wrapper instead >>>> of the unwrapped reader, so every merge rebuilt the graph from >>>> scratch. (Jeho Jeong) >>>> >>>> this was a pretty bad regression I think, although indexing >>>> performance only. It is lacking a CHANGES entry on main, sorry >>>> (because the bug did not occur on main)! I can address that >>>> separately >>>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 4:46 AM Ignacio Vera <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> I spoke with Alan offline and I will be the release manager. I am >>>>> planning to build the release candidate tomorrow if there are no concerns. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Ignacio >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 9:31 AM Alan Woodward <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> We’ve identified a nasty bug in lucene 10.5.0, where boolean queries >>>>>> using one of the doc-values based range queries as an exclusion clause >>>>>> can return incorrect results (see >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/16450). I think this warrants a >>>>>> bugfix release, and I’m happy to act as release manager (unless anybody >>>>>> else would like to volunteer :). >>>>>> >>>>>> We have a number of bug-fixes in the 10.6 changes section, but none of >>>>>> them look to me as if they are major enough to need back porting. There >>>>>> are a couple of performance bugs which could go either way but I’d lean >>>>>> towards keeping the release as small as possible to get this fix out >>>>>> quickly. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Alan >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >
