Sorry, yes, that’s what I meant! > On 5 Aug 2026, at 13:51, Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> wrote: > > I didn';t see a branch_10_5_1, so my backport was to branch_10_5 > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 7:39 AM Alan Woodward <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I have back-ported https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/16450 to the 10.5.1 >> branch. >> >> Thanks Ignacio! >> >> On 5 Aug 2026, at 12:23, Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> OK, I just did that, thanks >> >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 7:12 AM Ignacio Vera <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Sure Michael, >> >> The fix looks well self-contained (and tiny), please feel free to backport >> it to branch 10.5. >> >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 11:36 AM Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> That bugfix was in https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/16403/ >> (commit: 2459ab7749c6062d0ee5a946430745c46cd9fda4) >> >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 6:33 AM Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Is it possible to also include >> >> * GITHUB#16400: Restore HNSW graph reuse during merges under per-field >> vectors formats, >> including the default codec. Since 10.4.0 the merger tested the >> per-field wrapper instead >> of the unwrapped reader, so every merge rebuilt the graph from >> scratch. (Jeho Jeong) >> >> this was a pretty bad regression I think, although indexing >> performance only. It is lacking a CHANGES entry on main, sorry >> (because the bug did not occur on main)! I can address that >> separately >> >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 4:46 AM Ignacio Vera <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> +1 >> >> I spoke with Alan offline and I will be the release manager. I am planning >> to build the release candidate tomorrow if there are no concerns. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Ignacio >> >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 9:31 AM Alan Woodward <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> We’ve identified a nasty bug in lucene 10.5.0, where boolean queries using >> one of the doc-values based range queries as an exclusion clause can return >> incorrect results (see https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/16450). I >> think this warrants a bugfix release, and I’m happy to act as release >> manager (unless anybody else would like to volunteer :). >> >> We have a number of bug-fixes in the 10.6 changes section, but none of them >> look to me as if they are major enough to need back porting. There are a >> couple of performance bugs which could go either way but I’d lean towards >> keeping the release as small as possible to get this fix out quickly. >> >> - Alan >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
