Here are the release notes, any comments are welcome: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/spaces/LUCENE/pages/446071262/ReleaseNote10_5_1
On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 1:59 PM Alan Woodward <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry, yes, that’s what I meant! > > > On 5 Aug 2026, at 13:51, Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I didn';t see a branch_10_5_1, so my backport was to branch_10_5 > > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 7:39 AM Alan Woodward <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> I have back-ported https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/16450 to the > 10.5.1 branch. > >> > >> Thanks Ignacio! > >> > >> On 5 Aug 2026, at 12:23, Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> OK, I just did that, thanks > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 7:12 AM Ignacio Vera <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Sure Michael, > >> > >> The fix looks well self-contained (and tiny), please feel free to > backport it to branch 10.5. > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 11:36 AM Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> That bugfix was in https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/16403/ > >> (commit: 2459ab7749c6062d0ee5a946430745c46cd9fda4) > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 6:33 AM Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> Is it possible to also include > >> > >> * GITHUB#16400: Restore HNSW graph reuse during merges under per-field > >> vectors formats, > >> including the default codec. Since 10.4.0 the merger tested the > >> per-field wrapper instead > >> of the unwrapped reader, so every merge rebuilt the graph from > >> scratch. (Jeho Jeong) > >> > >> this was a pretty bad regression I think, although indexing > >> performance only. It is lacking a CHANGES entry on main, sorry > >> (because the bug did not occur on main)! I can address that > >> separately > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 4:46 AM Ignacio Vera <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> I spoke with Alan offline and I will be the release manager. I am > planning to build the release candidate tomorrow if there are no concerns. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Ignacio > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 9:31 AM Alan Woodward <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> We’ve identified a nasty bug in lucene 10.5.0, where boolean queries > using one of the doc-values based range queries as an exclusion clause can > return incorrect results (see https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/16450). > I think this warrants a bugfix release, and I’m happy to act as release > manager (unless anybody else would like to volunteer :). > >> > >> We have a number of bug-fixes in the 10.6 changes section, but none of > them look to me as if they are major enough to need back porting. There > are a couple of performance bugs which could go either way but I’d lean > towards keeping the release as small as possible to get this fix out > quickly. > >> > >> - Alan > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
