[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13150286#comment-13150286
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3573:
------------------------------------
bq. This way there is no 3-way logic - either the TR was refreshed or it was
not.
+1.
bq. And while we are at this, refresh() is void. I think it would be useful to
return boolean, indicating whether any refresh took place.
+1.
> TaxonomyReader.refresh() is broken, replace its logic with reopen(),
> following IR.reopen pattern
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3573
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3573
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: modules/facet
> Reporter: Doron Cohen
> Assignee: Doron Cohen
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-3573.patch
>
>
> When recreating the taxonomy index, TR's assumption that categories are only
> added does not hold anymore.
> As result, calling TR.refresh() will be incorrect at best, but usually throw
> an AIOOBE.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]