On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Simon Willnauer <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 I think we can easily build a "global" view of DV types like we do > for field numbers and be consistent across DWPT
if we do this, i would rather extend the fieldnumbers and: * throw exception if indexOptions conflict (e.g. omitTF=true versus false) instead of silently dropping positions on merge * same with omitNorms * same with norms types and docvalues types * still keeping field numbers consistent this way i think we could eliminate all these traps and just give an exception instead. -- lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
