On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Simon Willnauer > <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 I think we can easily build a "global" view of DV types like we do >> for field numbers and be consistent across DWPT > > if we do this, i would rather extend the fieldnumbers and: > * throw exception if indexOptions conflict (e.g. omitTF=true versus > false) instead of silently dropping positions on merge > * same with omitNorms > * same with norms types and docvalues types > * still keeping field numbers consistent > > this way i think we could eliminate all these traps and just give an > exception instead.
+1 Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
