On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Michael McCandless <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Simon Willnauer >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> +1 I think we can easily build a "global" view of DV types like we do >>> for field numbers and be consistent across DWPT >> >> if we do this, i would rather extend the fieldnumbers and: >> * throw exception if indexOptions conflict (e.g. omitTF=true versus >> false) instead of silently dropping positions on merge >> * same with omitNorms >> * same with norms types and docvalues types >> * still keeping field numbers consistent >> >> this way i think we could eliminate all these traps and just give an >> exception instead.
I will create an issue for this! this make perfect sense and removes all those traps simon > > +1 > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
