[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13292324#comment-13292324
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4101:
--------------------------------------------
{quote}
Well according to the original discussion, the BETA would guarantee API
stability
for public apis (unless we need to fix bugs).
{quote}
Ahh woops you're right ... so I think this issue blocks 4.0-BETA. But it looks
like we have tentative consensus here so I'll finish the current approach ...
bq. I didn't really mind the code dup since it spelled out clearly what the
type definitions were to prevent misreading like I just did, but no biggie.
OK I'll put it back. It's a tiny code dup and mis-reading risk is bad...
> Remove XXXField.TYPE_STORED
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4101
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4101
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 4.0, 5.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-4101.patch, LUCENE-4101.patch, LUCENE-4101.patch
>
>
> Spinoff from LUCENE-3312.
> For 4.0 I think we should simplify the sugar field APIs by requiring
> that you add a StoredField if you want to store the field. Expert users
> can still make a custom FieldType that both stores and indexes...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
