Shai Erera wrote > Yonik, unlike Solr facets (which manage everything in the search index), > the Lucene module comes with a sidecar taxonomy index, so e.g. when Solr > replicates shards, it will need to replicate one other index files. That's > the big difference, the rest are miniscule I think. And of course, Solr > has > a much higher level API than Lucene, so we'll need to translate those APIs > to the facets module.
Shai, RE: Sidecar index -- That's a huge difference and a shortcoming; no? Do you somehow take care to avoid a stale view on the sidecar index during a commit? On the upside; if this does proper hierarchical faceting then a Solr adapter for it would be awesome. ~ David ----- Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-faceting-vs-Lucene-faceting-tp4025577p4025928.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
