What's a little odd is that this should work exactly as it did before we used log4j - I just pure copied the code from a Formatter to a Layout. I originally suspected that the Layout is holding onto stuff, but thought perhaps that had something to do with java util logging vs log4j, since this didn't seem to previously show up as an issue. Perhaps we have added enough tests to cross a threshold while this was not in use.
In any case, it seems likely we can improve the Layout - I can take a look. - Mark On May 16, 2013, at 12:44 PM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: > My suspicion is that its that map key'ed on solrcore. > > in this case it would be holding references to SolrCores from previous > tests. Because test order and other things are randomized, it would > explain the huge size fluctuations. > > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Chris Hostetter > <hossman_luc...@fucit.org> wrote: >> >> >> : (b) is unlikely. Dump the allocation tree and see what's the major >> : contributor to the size. >> >> Right, see rmuir's response and the subsequent collection of aggregation >> of info in my comment on SOLR-4825... >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4825#comment-13659117 >> >> >> -Hoss >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
