[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13692199#comment-13692199
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-4808:
---------------------------------------------
bq. Why don't we have explicit names if that is the objective. terms like
'smart' 'auto' are very easy to be misinterpreted. An in the future , we may
add a few more properties and we will always be wondering whether it is a part
of the 'smart' thing or not
+1. I used this only as a place holder. Any suggestions?
bq. We might want to be more explicit since there will likely be more and more
aspects to managing a cluster going forward. Perhaps "autoRebalance", or if
there is a use-case for turning off one side or the other, "autoCreateReplicas"
and "autoDestroyReplicas"?
+1 for autoCreateReplicas and autoDestroyReplicas.
How do people feel about my suggestion on giving hints via GUI for a start
(instead of full-blown automatic cluster management)?
> Persist and use replication factor at Collection and Shard level
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-4808
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4808
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: SolrCloud
> Reporter: Anshum Gupta
> Assignee: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> Labels: solrcloud
>
> The replication factor for a collection as of now is not persisted and used
> while adding replicas.
> We should save the replication factor at collection factor as well as shard
> level.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
