+1 The package looks good to me! Thanks Prescott.
-Christopher On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Prescott Nasser <[email protected]> wrote: > bleh - I'll make sure we get that fixed before I upload to nuget - I'll make > two separate packages. > > ---------------------------------------- >> Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 02:48:27 +0200 >> Subject: Re: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 RC2 >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> >> There is one problem with the spatial nuget package. The following (taken >> from it's nuspec) doesn't make sense: >> >> <dependencies> >> <dependency id="Lucene.Net" version="3.0.3" /> >> <dependency id="Spatial4n.Core" version="0.3" /> >> <dependency id="Spatial4n.Core.NTS" version="0.3" /> >> </dependencies> >> >> It's either it depends on S4n.Core _or_ S4n.Core.NTS. Since Contrib.Spatial >> and Contrib.Spatial.NTS are two different things, there should probably be >> 2 different nuspecs and 2 different nuget packages, namely Contrib.Spatial >> and Contrib.Spatial.NTS. Unless the community is against, in that case I'd >> recommend having just the Contrib.Spatial.NTS package. >> >> +1 from me, since nupackaging doesn't require cutting a new release, just >> changing the nuspec and generating executing nuget on them again. >> >> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Prescott Nasser <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> > Alright, updated the source files, recompiled the binaries, and included >> > the nuget packages I'll be using to upload for inspection: >> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/3.0.3-RC2/ >> > >> > Please vote: >> > >> > +1 lets rock >> > 0 indifferent >> > -1 Not ready, because... >> > >> > Best of luck to us ;) >> > >> > ~Prescott >> >
