Cool On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Prescott Nasser <[email protected]>wrote:
> It doesn't stop the binaries from being released. They passed the vote, > they have passed substantial community review. Ideally we have a perfect > release, but there are always bugs. This is not a show stopper. We can put > out a hot fix for this or roll it into 3.6 imo. > > > > Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:35:51 +0200 > > Subject: Re: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 RC2 > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > > > Prescott, doesn't this bug report invalidate the vote? I mean, it does > mean > > one of the issues we had for this release is still open? > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Prescott Nasser <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > Alright, times up - looks like we just passssed for RC2 (3 PMC +1s) - > but > > > we got a number of votes for RC1 which on the whole is roughly the > same. > > > > > > Congrats to everyone who helped make 3.0.3 successful. > > > > > > I'll be moving the binaries to distribution and upgrading the nuget > > > packages later this evening > > > > > > ~Prescott > > > ---------------------------------------- > > > > From: [email protected] > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > Subject: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 RC2 > > > > Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 17:25:19 -0700 > > > > > > > > Alright, updated the source files, recompiled the binaries, and > included > > > the nuget packages I'll be using to upload for inspection: > > > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/3.0.3-RC2/ > > > > > > > > Please vote: > > > > > > > > +1 lets rock > > > > 0 indifferent > > > > -1 Not ready, because... > > > > > > > > Best of luck to us ;) > > > > > > > > ~Prescott > > > >
