Where do we file outstanding issues Sorry for the newbie question
IndexInput has abstract method Length() IndexOutput has abstract property Length Seems like the same convention should be used for both. Eli -----Original Message----- From: Christopher Currens [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2012 2:14 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 RC2 +1 The package looks good to me! Thanks Prescott. -Christopher On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Prescott Nasser <[email protected]> wrote: > bleh - I'll make sure we get that fixed before I upload to nuget - I'll make two separate packages. > > ---------------------------------------- >> Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 02:48:27 +0200 >> Subject: Re: [Vote] Apache Lucene.Net 3.0.3 RC2 >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> >> There is one problem with the spatial nuget package. The following >> (taken from it's nuspec) doesn't make sense: >> >> <dependencies> >> <dependency id="Lucene.Net" version="3.0.3" /> <dependency >> id="Spatial4n.Core" version="0.3" /> <dependency >> id="Spatial4n.Core.NTS" version="0.3" /> </dependencies> >> >> It's either it depends on S4n.Core _or_ S4n.Core.NTS. Since >> Contrib.Spatial and Contrib.Spatial.NTS are two different things, >> there should probably be >> 2 different nuspecs and 2 different nuget packages, namely >> Contrib.Spatial and Contrib.Spatial.NTS. Unless the community is >> against, in that case I'd recommend having just the Contrib.Spatial.NTS package. >> >> +1 from me, since nupackaging doesn't require cutting a new release, >> +just >> changing the nuspec and generating executing nuget on them again. >> >> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Prescott Nasser <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> > Alright, updated the source files, recompiled the binaries, and >> > included the nuget packages I'll be using to upload for inspection: >> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/3.0.3-RC2/ >> > >> > Please vote: >> > >> > +1 lets rock >> > 0 indifferent >> > -1 Not ready, because... >> > >> > Best of luck to us ;) >> > >> > ~Prescott >> >
