I would love it. Especially since it doesn't check the results. On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It takes about five minutes to run too, which is maybe 1/3 of the whole > test > time. Would anyone be offended if we made this a non-test test that didn't > run by default? > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > No. That isn't the issue. Several of these tests run faster and when > run > > in isolation they don't seem to complete or fail. They stop executing, > but > > no succeeding tests run. > > > > >
