Fixed. Did a JIRA anyway. On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The problem is that System.out was being closed. This is a trivial fix. I > have a fix and will commit it shortly without a JIRA. > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> If I enable *any* of the TestClusterDumper tests then all further tests >> are prevented from running. If I disable *all* of them, everything works >> fine. >> >> I first suspected a call to System.exit(), but I don't see any. Will >> debug further. >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> The problem wasn't the time. It was that the tests stopped executing >>> without letting subsequent tests run. I will update and check it out. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Jeff Eastman <jeast...@narus.com>wrote: >>> >>>> This pulled a couple minutes out of the build, but core is still the >>>> long pole in the tent, at 12m on my laptop. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Jeff Eastman [mailto:jeast...@narus.com] >>>> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 9:52 AM >>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org >>>> Subject: RE: problems with util test cases >>>> >>>> One easy fix would be to use the sequential mode processing for the >>>> cluster dumper tests. Running in mapreduce mode the test takes 3 minutes on >>>> my laptop. With sequential mode it takes 2m10s, all but 22s doing SVD and >>>> DSVD computations (3 tests). With those 3 commented out it runs most >>>> quickly. I will commit that change now. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunn...@gmail.com] >>>> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 9:16 AM >>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org >>>> Subject: Re: problems with util test cases >>>> >>>> Yes. Makes huge sense to open a ticket. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Christopher Jordan <cjor...@gilt.com >>>> >wrote: >>>> >>>> > Does it make sense to open a ticket to fix these test cases? I am >>>> likely >>>> > going to be poking at the cluster dumper next week and might be able >>>> to >>>> > help. >>>> > >>>> > On Apr 22, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > I would love it. Especially since it doesn't check the results. >>>> > > >>>> > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > >> It takes about five minutes to run too, which is maybe 1/3 of the >>>> whole >>>> > >> test >>>> > >> time. Would anyone be offended if we made this a non-test test that >>>> > didn't >>>> > >> run by default? >>>> > >> >>>> > >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Ted Dunning < >>>> ted.dunn...@gmail.com> >>>> > >> wrote: >>>> > >> >>>> > >>> No. That isn't the issue. Several of these tests run faster and >>>> when >>>> > >> run >>>> > >>> in isolation they don't seem to complete or fail. They stop >>>> executing, >>>> > >> but >>>> > >>> no succeeding tests run. >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> > >> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >> >
