The problem wasn't the time. It was that the tests stopped executing without letting subsequent tests run. I will update and check it out.
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Jeff Eastman <jeast...@narus.com> wrote: > This pulled a couple minutes out of the build, but core is still the long > pole in the tent, at 12m on my laptop. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Eastman [mailto:jeast...@narus.com] > Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 9:52 AM > To: dev@mahout.apache.org > Subject: RE: problems with util test cases > > One easy fix would be to use the sequential mode processing for the cluster > dumper tests. Running in mapreduce mode the test takes 3 minutes on my > laptop. With sequential mode it takes 2m10s, all but 22s doing SVD and DSVD > computations (3 tests). With those 3 commented out it runs most quickly. I > will commit that change now. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunn...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 9:16 AM > To: dev@mahout.apache.org > Subject: Re: problems with util test cases > > Yes. Makes huge sense to open a ticket. > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Christopher Jordan <cjor...@gilt.com > >wrote: > > > Does it make sense to open a ticket to fix these test cases? I am likely > > going to be poking at the cluster dumper next week and might be able to > > help. > > > > On Apr 22, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > > > > I would love it. Especially since it doesn't check the results. > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> It takes about five minutes to run too, which is maybe 1/3 of the > whole > > >> test > > >> time. Would anyone be offended if we made this a non-test test that > > didn't > > >> run by default? > > >> > > >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> No. That isn't the issue. Several of these tests run faster and > when > > >> run > > >>> in isolation they don't seem to complete or fail. They stop > executing, > > >> but > > >>> no succeeding tests run. > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > >
