I think the path should be /trunk

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]>wrote:

> ok i am doing something wrong. when i am trying to upload patch there, it
> says
>
> Something broke! (Error 500)
>
> It appears something broke when you tried to go to here. This is
> either a bug in Review Board or a server configuration error. Please
> report this to your administrator.
>
> i specify diff path as / for repo mahout
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Jake Mannix <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > You mean other than a web UI to see the patch, without having to download
> > it, make sure you have a clean checkout to apply it to, then fire it up
> in
> > your IDE, again making sure you have actually caught all the diffs?
> >
> > But yes, threaded comments inline with the code and the ability to easily
> > show differences between patch versions lead to this workflow: patch
> > uploaded, review created.  People point out problems line by line, the
> > original poster (or someone else) replies in-line, corrects the patch,
> > uploads it again, and the reviewers can click the "show diffs of patch 2
> > relative to patch 1", and very quickly see their concerns were taken care
> > of, click "ship-it", and its good to go.
> >
> > Once you get in the rhythm of it, it leads to far more careful reviewing
> by
> > more eyeballs, IMO.  We use it religously at Twitter.
> >
> >  -jake
> >
> > On Dec 13, 2011 8:50 AM, "Dmitriy Lyubimov" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I guess the fact that you can select a code fragment you are commenting
> on.
> > But I haven't yet fully learned how to use it.
> >
> > On Dec 13, 2011 8:41 AM, "Grant Ingersoll" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > What benefit does the rev...
>

Reply via email to