i am on vacation, so most of the pacific daylight ranges on any day should work for me.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Sebastian Schelter <[email protected]> wrote: > Friday would also work for me. > > > On 03/19/2014 08:05 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > >> Same here, travel next week and in Amsterdam the first week of April. I >> avoid Sundays or weekends for obvious reasons. How bout this Friday? >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Mar 19, 2014, at 3:02 AM, Sebastian Schelter <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Would some time on sunday work? I'll be traveling the next two weeks >>> starting from Tuesday. >>> >>> Best, >>> Sebastian >>> >>> >>> On 03/19/2014 07:55 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote: >>>> I had a hangout setup for 0.9, not sure if its still valid; I can >>>> check on that or can set one up now. When would people wanna have it? >>>> Mondays and Wednesdays don't work for me. Would Tuesdays 6pm Eastern >>>> Time work ? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 2:45 AM, Sebastian Schelter < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Saikat, >>>> >>>> 1) I think that Mahout-1248 and 1249 are still very important features >>>> that I would love to see in the codebase as they would highly improve >>>> the usability of our ALS code. >>>> >>>> 2) I think the last discussion item regarding h2o was to find a way to >>>> compare it against existing or spark related algorithm implementation to >>>> get a better picture of programming model and performance. I also don't >>>> feel that a final decision has been reached about this. >>>> >>>> >>>> 3) We should have the hangout, can someone step up and organize it? >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Sebastian >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 03/19/2014 04:45 AM, Saikat Kanjilal wrote: >>>>> Hi Guys, >>>>> I read through the email threads with the weigh ins for the inclusion >>>>> of H2O as well as spark and wanted to circle back on the plan for folks to >>>>> meet around 1.0, so a few questions: >>>>> >>>>> 1) How does the inclusion of H2O and spark weigh in importance versus >>>>> the current JIRA items that are existing for potentially new feature work >>>>> to be done in mahout (in my case JIRA 1248/1249) >>>>> 2) From reading all the responses it doesn't seem like there's full >>>>> consensus on what the next steps are for h2o and how that relates to the >>>>> roadmap around 1.0, please correct me if I'm misunderstanding, can someone >>>>> outline whether any concrete decisions have been made on whether or not >>>>> mahout 1.0 will include h2o bindings >>>>> 3) Are we moving forward with the google hangout , I didnt receive >>>>> >>>> anything about this yet >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance. >>>>> >>>> >>> >
