I mean whether or not that will be included within the 1.0 release, I actually see this as a big step in productionalizing and making mahout easier to use.
> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:28:40 +0100 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Plan for 1.0 > > Hi Saikat, > > What do you exactly mean by evaluation of PredictionIO? > > -s > > On 03/19/2014 04:26 PM, Saikat Kanjilal wrote: > > One last thing, can we add the evaluation of PredictionIO to the list of > > topics for 1.0, I think thisThanks > > > > > >> From: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: Plan for 1.0 > >> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:14:26 -0700 > >> To: [email protected] > >> CC: [email protected] > >> > >> I'm on pacific standard time and am free Sundays late afternoon > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > >>> On Mar 19, 2014, at 12:13 AM, "Dmitriy Lyubimov" <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> i am on vacation, so most of the pacific daylight ranges on any day should > >>> work for me. > >>> > >>> > >>>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Sebastian Schelter <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Friday would also work for me. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On 03/19/2014 08:05 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Same here, travel next week and in Amsterdam the first week of April. I > >>>>> avoid Sundays or weekends for obvious reasons. How bout this Friday? > >>>>> > >>>>> Sent from my iPhone > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Mar 19, 2014, at 3:02 AM, Sebastian Schelter <[email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Would some time on sunday work? I'll be traveling the next two weeks > >>>>>> starting from Tuesday. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Best, > >>>>>> Sebastian > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 03/19/2014 07:55 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > >>>>>>> I had a hangout setup for 0.9, not sure if its still valid; I can > >>>>>>> check on that or can set one up now. When would people wanna have it? > >>>>>>> Mondays and Wednesdays don't work for me. Would Tuesdays 6pm Eastern > >>>>>>> Time work ? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 2:45 AM, Sebastian Schelter < > >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi Saikat, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 1) I think that Mahout-1248 and 1249 are still very important features > >>>>>>> that I would love to see in the codebase as they would highly improve > >>>>>>> the usability of our ALS code. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 2) I think the last discussion item regarding h2o was to find a way to > >>>>>>> compare it against existing or spark related algorithm implementation > >>>>>>> to > >>>>>>> get a better picture of programming model and performance. I also > >>>>>>> don't > >>>>>>> feel that a final decision has been reached about this. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 3) We should have the hangout, can someone step up and organize it? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>> Sebastian > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 03/19/2014 04:45 AM, Saikat Kanjilal wrote: > >>>>>>>> Hi Guys, > >>>>>>>> I read through the email threads with the weigh ins for the inclusion > >>>>>>>> of H2O as well as spark and wanted to circle back on the plan for > >>>>>>>> folks to > >>>>>>>> meet around 1.0, so a few questions: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 1) How does the inclusion of H2O and spark weigh in importance versus > >>>>>>>> the current JIRA items that are existing for potentially new feature > >>>>>>>> work > >>>>>>>> to be done in mahout (in my case JIRA 1248/1249) > >>>>>>>> 2) From reading all the responses it doesn't seem like there's full > >>>>>>>> consensus on what the next steps are for h2o and how that relates to > >>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>> roadmap around 1.0, please correct me if I'm misunderstanding, can > >>>>>>>> someone > >>>>>>>> outline whether any concrete decisions have been made on whether or > >>>>>>>> not > >>>>>>>> mahout 1.0 will include h2o bindings > >>>>>>>> 3) Are we moving forward with the google hangout , I didnt receive > >>>>>>> anything about this yet > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks in advance. > >>>> > > > > >
