Here's the link for friday's hangout https://plus.google.com/events/c6l5kkq8be142uu2fi4o492fe48
On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 2:38 PM, Frank Scholten <[email protected]> wrote: I can make Friday. On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:01 PM, peng <[email protected]> wrote: > I have Saturday, Sunday and EDT 1700+. > > > On Wed 19 Mar 2014 12:30:49 PM EDT, Andrew Musselman wrote: > >> Friday afternoon Pacific Time is good for me too. >> >> On Mar 19, 2014, at 12:14 AM, Saikat Kanjilal <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I'm on pacific standard time and am free Sundays late afternoon >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Mar 19, 2014, at 12:13 AM, "Dmitriy Lyubimov" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> i am on vacation, so most of the pacific daylight ranges on any day >>>> should >>>> work for me. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Sebastian Schelter <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Friday would also work for me. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 03/19/2014 08:05 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Same here, travel next week and in Amsterdam the first week of April. >>>>>> I >>>>>> avoid Sundays or weekends for obvious reasons. How bout this Friday? >>>>>> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mar 19, 2014, at 3:02 AM, Sebastian Schelter <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Would some time on sunday work? I'll be traveling the next two weeks >>>>>>> starting from Tuesday. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> Sebastian >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 03/19/2014 07:55 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote: >>>>>>>> I had a hangout setup for 0.9, not sure if its still valid; I can >>>>>>>> check on that or can set one up now. When would people wanna have >>>>>>>> it? >>>>>>>> Mondays and Wednesdays don't work for me. Would Tuesdays 6pm >>>>>>>> Eastern >>>>>>>> Time work ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 2:45 AM, Sebastian Schelter < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Saikat, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1) I think that Mahout-1248 and 1249 are still very important >>>>>>>> features >>>>>>>> that I would love to see in the codebase as they would highly >>>>>>>> improve >>>>>>>> the usability of our ALS code. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2) I think the last discussion item regarding h2o was to find a way >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> compare it against existing or spark related algorithm >>>>>>>> implementation to >>>>>>>> get a better picture of programming model and performance. I also >>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>> feel that a final decision has been reached about this. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 3) We should have the hangout, can someone step up and organize it? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> Sebastian >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 03/19/2014 04:45 AM, Saikat Kanjilal wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi Guys, >>>>>>>>> I read through the email threads with the weigh ins for the >>>>>>>>> inclusion >>>>>>>>> of H2O as well as spark and wanted to circle back on the plan for >>>>>>>>> folks to >>>>>>>>> meet around 1.0, so a few questions: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 1) How does the inclusion of H2O and spark weigh in importance >>>>>>>>> versus >>>>>>>>> the current JIRA items that are existing for potentially new >>>>>>>>> feature work >>>>>>>>> to be done in mahout (in my case JIRA 1248/1249) >>>>>>>>> 2) From reading all the responses it doesn't seem like there's full >>>>>>>>> consensus on what the next steps are for h2o and how that relates >>>>>>>>> to the >>>>>>>>> roadmap around 1.0, please correct me if I'm misunderstanding, can >>>>>>>>> someone >>>>>>>>> outline whether any concrete decisions have been made on whether >>>>>>>>> or not >>>>>>>>> mahout 1.0 will include h2o bindings >>>>>>>>> 3) Are we moving forward with the google hangout , I didnt receive >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> anything about this yet >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>
