I don't see a time zone on the hangout. Is that 4-5 PM PDT?
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]>wrote: > Here's the link for friday's hangout > > https://plus.google.com/events/c6l5kkq8be142uu2fi4o492fe48 > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 2:38 PM, Frank Scholten < > [email protected]> wrote: > > I can make Friday. > > > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:01 PM, peng <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have Saturday, Sunday and EDT 1700+. > > > > > > On Wed 19 Mar 2014 12:30:49 PM EDT, Andrew Musselman wrote: > > > >> Friday afternoon Pacific Time is good for me too. > >> > >> On Mar 19, 2014, at 12:14 AM, Saikat Kanjilal <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> I'm on pacific standard time and am free Sundays late afternoon > >>> > >>> Sent from my iPhone > >>> > >>> On Mar 19, 2014, at 12:13 AM, "Dmitriy Lyubimov" <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> i am on vacation, so most of the pacific daylight ranges on any day > >>>> should > >>>> work for me. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Sebastian Schelter <[email protected] > > > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Friday would also work for me. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 03/19/2014 08:05 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Same here, travel next week and in Amsterdam the first week of > April. > >>>>>> I > >>>>>> avoid Sundays or weekends for obvious reasons. How bout this Friday? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Mar 19, 2014, at 3:02 AM, Sebastian Schelter <[email protected]> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Would some time on sunday work? I'll be traveling the next two > weeks > >>>>>>> starting from Tuesday. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>> Sebastian > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 03/19/2014 07:55 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > >>>>>>>> I had a hangout setup for 0.9, not sure if its still valid; I can > >>>>>>>> check on that or can set one up now. When would people wanna have > >>>>>>>> it? > >>>>>>>> Mondays and Wednesdays don't work for me. Would Tuesdays 6pm > >>>>>>>> Eastern > >>>>>>>> Time work ? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 2:45 AM, Sebastian Schelter < > >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi Saikat, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 1) I think that Mahout-1248 and 1249 are still very important > >>>>>>>> features > >>>>>>>> that I would love to see in the codebase as they would highly > >>>>>>>> improve > >>>>>>>> the usability of our ALS code. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 2) I think the last discussion item regarding h2o was to find a > way > >>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>> compare it against existing or spark related algorithm > >>>>>>>> implementation to > >>>>>>>> get a better picture of programming model and performance. I also > >>>>>>>> don't > >>>>>>>> feel that a final decision has been reached about this. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 3) We should have the hangout, can someone step up and organize > it? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>> Sebastian > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 03/19/2014 04:45 AM, Saikat Kanjilal wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Hi Guys, > >>>>>>>>> I read through the email threads with the weigh ins for the > >>>>>>>>> inclusion > >>>>>>>>> of H2O as well as spark and wanted to circle back on the plan for > >>>>>>>>> folks to > >>>>>>>>> meet around 1.0, so a few questions: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> 1) How does the inclusion of H2O and spark weigh in importance > >>>>>>>>> versus > >>>>>>>>> the current JIRA items that are existing for potentially new > >>>>>>>>> feature work > >>>>>>>>> to be done in mahout (in my case JIRA 1248/1249) > >>>>>>>>> 2) From reading all the responses it doesn't seem like there's > full > >>>>>>>>> consensus on what the next steps are for h2o and how that relates > >>>>>>>>> to the > >>>>>>>>> roadmap around 1.0, please correct me if I'm misunderstanding, > can > >>>>>>>>> someone > >>>>>>>>> outline whether any concrete decisions have been made on whether > >>>>>>>>> or not > >>>>>>>>> mahout 1.0 will include h2o bindings > >>>>>>>>> 3) Are we moving forward with the google hangout , I didnt > receive > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> anything about this yet > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>> >
