Yes, I am in EDT. So 4-5pm PDT.




On Friday, March 21, 2014 12:25 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote:
 


I don't see a time zone on the hangout.

Is that 4-5 PM PDT?





On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]> wrote:

Here's the link for friday's hangout
>
>https://plus.google.com/events/c6l5kkq8be142uu2fi4o492fe48
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 2:38 PM, Frank Scholten <[email protected]> 
>wrote:
>
>I can make Friday.
>
>
>
>On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:01 PM, peng <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I have Saturday, Sunday and EDT 1700+.
>>
>>
>> On Wed 19 Mar 2014 12:30:49 PM EDT, Andrew Musselman wrote:
>>
>>> Friday afternoon Pacific Time is good for me too.
>>>
>>>  On Mar 19, 2014, at 12:14 AM, Saikat Kanjilal <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm on pacific standard time and am free Sundays late afternoon
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>>  On Mar 19, 2014, at 12:13 AM, "Dmitriy Lyubimov" <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> i am on vacation, so most of the pacific daylight ranges on any day
>>>>> should
>>>>> work for me.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Sebastian Schelter <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Friday would also work for me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  On 03/19/2014 08:05 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Same here, travel next week and in Amsterdam the first week of April.
>>>>>>>  I
>>>>>>> avoid Sundays or weekends for obvious reasons. How bout this Friday?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  On Mar 19, 2014, at 3:02 AM, Sebastian Schelter <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Would some time on sunday work? I'll be traveling the next two weeks
>>>>>>>> starting from Tuesday.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  On 03/19/2014 07:55 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I had a hangout setup for 0.9, not sure if its still valid;  I can
>>>>>>>>> check on that or can set one up now. When would people wanna have
>>>>>>>>> it?
>>>>>>>>> Mondays and Wednesdays don't work for me.  Would Tuesdays 6pm
>>>>>>>>> Eastern
>>>>>>>>> Time work ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 2:45 AM, Sebastian Schelter <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Saikat,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1) I think that Mahout-1248 and 1249 are still very important
>>>>>>>>> features
>>>>>>>>> that I would love to see in the codebase as they would highly
>>>>>>>>> improve
>>>>>>>>> the usability of our ALS code.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2) I think the last discussion item regarding h2o was to find a way
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> compare it against existing or spark related algorithm
>>>>>>>>> implementation to
>>>>>>>>> get a better picture of programming model and performance. I also
>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>> feel that a final decision has been reached about this.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3) We should have the hangout, can someone step up and organize it?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  On 03/19/2014 04:45 AM, Saikat Kanjilal wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys,
>>>>>>>>>> I read through the email threads with the weigh ins for the
>>>>>>>>>> inclusion
>>>>>>>>>> of H2O as well as spark and wanted to circle back on the plan for
>>>>>>>>>> folks to
>>>>>>>>>> meet around 1.0, so a few questions:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1) How does the inclusion of H2O and spark weigh in importance
>>>>>>>>>> versus
>>>>>>>>>> the current JIRA items that are existing for potentially new
>>>>>>>>>> feature work
>>>>>>>>>> to be done in mahout (in my case JIRA 1248/1249)
>>>>>>>>>> 2) From reading all the responses it doesn't seem like there's full
>>>>>>>>>> consensus on what the next steps are for h2o and how that relates
>>>>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>>> roadmap around 1.0, please correct me if I'm misunderstanding, can
>>>>>>>>>> someone
>>>>>>>>>> outline whether any concrete decisions have been made on whether
>>>>>>>>>> or not
>>>>>>>>>> mahout 1.0 will include h2o bindings
>>>>>>>>>> 3) Are we moving forward with the google hangout , I didnt receive
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> anything about this yet
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>

Reply via email to