We have at least four people on board for Friday.

> On Mar 19, 2014, at 8:55 PM, Saikat Kanjilal <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Suneel,Any chance we can do the hangout on Sunday instead?  There's no way 
> for me to do it on Friday.Thanks
> 
>> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 20:53:03 -0700
>> From: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Plan for 1.0
>> To: [email protected]
>> 
>> Here's the link for friday's hangout
>> 
>> https://plus.google.com/events/c6l5kkq8be142uu2fi4o492fe48
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 2:38 PM, Frank Scholten 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I can make Friday.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:01 PM, peng <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I have Saturday, Sunday and EDT 1700+.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Wed 19 Mar 2014 12:30:49 PM EDT, Andrew Musselman wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Friday afternoon Pacific Time is good for me too.
>>>> 
>>>> On Mar 19, 2014, at 12:14 AM, Saikat Kanjilal <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm on pacific standard time and am free Sundays late afternoon
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 19, 2014, at 12:13 AM, "Dmitriy Lyubimov" <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> i am on vacation, so most of the pacific daylight ranges on any day
>>>>>> should
>>>>>> work for me.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Sebastian Schelter <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Friday would also work for me.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 03/19/2014 08:05 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Same here, travel next week and in Amsterdam the first week of April.
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>> avoid Sundays or weekends for obvious reasons. How bout this Friday?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mar 19, 2014, at 3:02 AM, Sebastian Schelter <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Would some time on sunday work? I'll be traveling the next two weeks
>>>>>>>>> starting from Tuesday.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 03/19/2014 07:55 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> I had a hangout setup for 0.9, not sure if its still valid;  I can
>>>>>>>>>> check on that or can set one up now. When would people wanna have
>>>>>>>>>> it?
>>>>>>>>>> Mondays and Wednesdays don't work for me.  Would Tuesdays 6pm
>>>>>>>>>> Eastern
>>>>>>>>>> Time work ?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 2:45 AM, Sebastian Schelter <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Saikat,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 1) I think that Mahout-1248 and 1249 are still very important
>>>>>>>>>> features
>>>>>>>>>> that I would love to see in the codebase as they would highly
>>>>>>>>>> improve
>>>>>>>>>> the usability of our ALS code.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 2) I think the last discussion item regarding h2o was to find a way
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> compare it against existing or spark related algorithm
>>>>>>>>>> implementation to
>>>>>>>>>> get a better picture of programming model and performance. I also
>>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>>> feel that a final decision has been reached about this.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 3) We should have the hangout, can someone step up and organize it?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On 03/19/2014 04:45 AM, Saikat Kanjilal wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys,
>>>>>>>>>>> I read through the email threads with the weigh ins for the
>>>>>>>>>>> inclusion
>>>>>>>>>>> of H2O as well as spark and wanted to circle back on the plan for
>>>>>>>>>>> folks to
>>>>>>>>>>> meet around 1.0, so a few questions:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 1) How does the inclusion of H2O and spark weigh in importance
>>>>>>>>>>> versus
>>>>>>>>>>> the current JIRA items that are existing for potentially new
>>>>>>>>>>> feature work
>>>>>>>>>>> to be done in mahout (in my case JIRA 1248/1249)
>>>>>>>>>>> 2) From reading all the responses it doesn't seem like there's full
>>>>>>>>>>> consensus on what the next steps are for h2o and how that relates
>>>>>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>>>> roadmap around 1.0, please correct me if I'm misunderstanding, can
>>>>>>>>>>> someone
>>>>>>>>>>> outline whether any concrete decisions have been made on whether
>>>>>>>>>>> or not
>>>>>>>>>>> mahout 1.0 will include h2o bindings
>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Are we moving forward with the google hangout , I didnt receive
>>>>>>>>>> anything about this yet
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>                         

Reply via email to