On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Anand Avati <av...@gluster.org> wrote:
> Also, if we did not have Keys in DRM, most of > the code in the DSL need not have a type parameter, making it so much > simpler for a first timer to read.. > This is also something i absolutely not sure where it is coming from. Let's see: Mahout expression | R expression A %*% B | A %*% B A[, 5] | A(::,5) cbind(A,B) | A cbind B A * B | A * B 1 / x | 1 /: x t(A) | A.t norm(A) | A.norm colSums(A) | A.colSums Where is the "struggle" here ? I suspect the real reason for all these questions is not architectural, but rather simplification of H20 bindings. That is, probably, a really worthy question: are we ready to screw legacy algorithm compatibility and existing bindings' merits just to make h2o integration easier? This is a good question, but i am far from sure i would vote "yes" here.
